
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Der Informationsfluss zwischen Kassa- und Terminmärkten kann, insbesondere in Zeiten turbulenter Märkte, zeitlich variieren. Dieser Beitrag analysiert den Informationsgehalt im Bund Future und in den zugrundeliegenden Bundesanleihen für das Jahr 1998 und testet auf zeitliche Konstanz. Unsere Analyse basiert auf Hochfrequenzdaten und erlaubt daher die Untersuchung möglicher Unvollkommenheiten im Informationsfluss zwischen beiden Märkten. Wir messen den Beitrag der Handelstransaktionen auf dem Kassa- und Terminmarkt zum Preisbildungsprozess mit Hilfe des Informationsanteil Ansatzes von Hasbrouck (1995) sowie eines Ansatzes basierend auf der Gonzalo-Granger Zerlegung. Um das zugrundeliegende Fehler-Korrektur-Modell schätzen zu können, wenn Datenlücken vorliegen, wird ein Zustands-Raum-Modell verwendet. Wir testen auf Strukturbrüche im Preisbildungsprozess der Märkte und schätzen die Zeitpunkte der Strukturbrüche. Obwohl die meiste Information in den Preisen der Terminkontrakte enthalten sind, liefert der Kassamarkt einen nicht unerheblichen Beitrag zum Preisbildungsprozess. Unter normalen Marktbedingungen trägt die Bundesanleihe mit 19 bis 33 Prozent zur Bestimmung des Effizienzpreises bei. Der Informationsbeitrag des Kassamarktes verschwindet jedoch während Zeiten mit Marktturbulenzen. Zum Beispiel brach der Informationsanteil des Kassamarktes während der LTCM Rekapitalisierungsphase völlig zusammen. Der Terminkurs reagierte in dieser Phase nicht mehr auf Preisbewegungen am Kassamarkt und die Anpassung an das Arbitragegleichgewicht erfolgte ausschließlich durch den Kassakurs.
Hi
Some example of EA High Frequency?
Regards,
Rogério
Hi
Some example of EA High Frequency?
Regards,
Rogério
Hi
Some example of EA High Frequency?
Regards,
Rogério
Many practices associated with the new stock market are highly controversial, as illustrated by the public furor following the publication of Michael Lewis’s book Flash Boys. Critics say that HFTs use their speed in discovering changes in the market and in altering their orders to take advantage of other traders. Dark pools – off-exchange trading venues that promise to keep the orders sent to them secret and to restrict the parties allowed to trade – are accused of operating in ways that injure many traders. Brokers are said to mishandle customer orders in an effort to maximize the payments they receive in return for sending trading venues their customers’ orders, rather than delivering best execution.
In this paper, we set out a simple, but powerful, conceptual framework for analyzing the new stock market. The framework is built upon three basic concepts: adverse selection, the principal-agent problem, and a multi-venue trading system. We illustrate the utility of this framework by analyzing the new market’s eight most controversial practices. The effects of each practice are evaluated in terms of the multiple social goals served by equity trading markets.
We ultimately conclude that there is no emergency requiring immediate, poorly-considered action. Some reforms proposed by critics, however, are clearly desirable. Other proposed reforms involve a tradeoff between two or more valuable social goals. In these cases, whether a reform is desirable may be unclear, but a better understanding of the tradeoff involved enables a more informed choice and suggests where further empirical research would be useful. Finally, still other proposed reforms are based on misunderstandings of the market or of the social impacts of a practice and should be avoided.
Method. The research consisted of a case study. Participants (N=30) were high frequency traders, algorithm developers, consultants, quant analysts, quantitative strategists, ultra low-latency data scientists, or managers of HFT companies. Participation involved an interview (N=27) or a completion of a questionnaire (N=3). HFT actors were asked to report what ethical considerations are involved in their work.
Results. Participants’ answers showed that many HFT actors considered legal and regulatory issues a central component of their ethical conduct. However, a proportion of the participants was concerned with the social contribution of their practice and with the public image of HFT. In particular, perceiving HFT as having neutral or negative effect on the market was related with sense of meaninglessness.
Conclusions. Ethics perceptions of HFT actors are characterised by a personal nature. Beyond the overlap between the notions of ethics and legality, they reflect the human tendency to search for meaning and the need to have a positive image.