Discussion of article "Graphical interfaces X: Advanced management of lists and tables. Code optimization (build 7)" - page 5

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In the symbol specification there are its sessions - quote and trading. Perhaps we should try to start from them....
Things are not always smooth with them. It's come up a few times on the forum.
Great work - just a clump, but easy to use...
Delighted !
Thank you so much !
Great job - just a clump, but easy to use...
Delighted !
Thank you !
If you have any questions or are missing anything, please ask and make suggestions. I'll think about implementing it.
Strange. Adding one row to a list or table is available, but deleting one row from a list or table is not.
To delete a row, you need to clear the whole list and create it again without this row (in the table you also need to restore the header if it was there). At the same time you need to remember the state of the checkboxes that were there before the list was cleared.
Tol, are you planning to introduce this into the library, or do we have to do it ourselves?
Strange. Adding one row to a list or table is available, but deleting one row from a list or table is not.
To delete a row, you need to clear the whole list and create it again without this row (in the table you also need to restore the header if it was there). At the same time you need to remember the state of the checkboxes that were there before the list was cleared.
Tol, are you planning to introduce this into the library, or do we have to do it ourselves?
I would even more precisely say: "It's strange that everything is not done at a snap of the fingers". The whole range of possibilities is planned, but when it will be unknown. I don't want to make empty promises. After all, for one reason or another, it may not happen at all.
Of course, it is also useful to "make it up" yourself sometimes.
I'd even be more precise: "It's strange that everything and all at once was not done at the snap of fingers". The whole range of possibilities is planned, but when it will be is unknown. I don't want to make empty promises. After all, for one reason or another, it may not happen at all.
Of course it's also useful to "get out of it" yourself sometimes.
Ohhhhhh... Why would you do that? "At the snap of a finger" ... ... If only like that, you would still be sitting at the beginning stage, rather than sawing for yourself what is already there.
So I asked. I didn't initially pay attention to the fact that it's not here - I thought that since there is an addition, it means that the deletion as if by itself. That's why I was surprised that there isn't.
And to get out of it - that's what we are, to do what is necessary, and not what is from what is there
Why are you trying to offend me? I'm not offended. Not at all ;)Of course, it is also useful to "get out of it" sometimes.
It's not wrong to ask. Right?
Or else I'll rework it for myself, and in the next update it's already there - I've been digging through the code for nothing - I'll have to rework it back and forth again.
There's no harm in asking. Right?
Or else I'll rework it for myself, and in the next update it's already there - I'll have to rework the code again for nothing.
Well, you are not used to "back and forth redesigning". )
There will probably be a new article next week. I will present the first version of the multi-line input field. In subsequent articles I will gradually add everything we discussed in private and on the forum.
Well, you're not used to "back and forth redesigns". )
There will probably be a new article next week. I will present the first version of the multiline input field. In subsequent articles I will gradually add everything we discussed in private and on the forum.
Redesigning is our everything :))))))
Let's wait, let's read and spin )