You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You don't agree that an assumption must be made ? yet you made the assumption that the units I was talking about for the Opposite and Adjacent were the same . . . hence your answer of 45 deg. An angle of 45 deg has an absolute meaning, it is 1/8th of a full circle . . . no more information is needed to define it . . . this does not hold true for an "angle" on a chart, other information is needed to define the "angle" this makes it no longer what it was meant to be.
So you have to say, "45 deg - where the scale is fixed to 1:1 and x minutes/bars is considered the same as y points" this qualification means you do not have an angle, a true angle needs no such qualification, it is absolute. So why not say what you mean . . . don't twist what is actually a gradient/slope into a false visual representation of an angle . . .
I did say what I mean. My first reply on this thread was:
SDC2014.01.05 18:19#
First you have to decide what scale you are using to consider the trend is 45 degrees.