
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
My problem is, I cannot be bothered to create an EA since it will not be accurate. I am led to believe that by creating an EA, it will never be accurate and so if you have time on your hand, you can forward test an EA. This to me im afraid is not worth it since EA needs to have worked from old data to new.
So Craig, is there a way of really having an EA that has accurate backtested trades?
So if I follow what you have said, it will work?
Like this link for instance: www.metatrader.info/node/67 If I Follow these steps i will be ok?
By accurate, I mean rough shape of equity curve & win/loss %.
Now all I need is a profitable EA! I have been writing and searching for nearly a year now and can't find one (that does not take undue risk).
The negative tone of my previous post is due to the fact I believe this backtesting thing could/should all be much easier.
If your EA must perfect trade actions (open/close/modify) on every tick, you must back test it (your EA) in mode Every Ticks.
As for the 'Control points', I see it mainly as a slightly better way to test EA's that trade completed bars. The point here is to test such EA's with 'Control points' to make sure that it correctly detects new bars, chooses the right prices for entries/exits even when recieving in-bar data, i.e. a bit closer to the real mode.
Those who trade by ticks should always use 'Every tick'. Even though it skips some important prices it's much better compared to 'Control points'.