Hello ,
the backtest with high quality modeling is already done in the test phase (period of 16 years). but after finalizing the product, doing the same backtest requires a lot of time.
you can download the demo and do the test.
thanks for your intervention.
And EAs with prices like this NEVER show a real signal...
Hello,
A backtest for a long time is better than a real signal. the latter shows efficiency only under current conditions.
you can download the demo and do the test.
thanks for your intervention.
Mourad Ezzaki: Hello,
A backtest for a long time is better than a real signal. the latter shows efficiency only under current conditions.
you can download the demo and do the test.
thanks for your intervention.
Of course, who cares real conditions trading ? Better to test with a fixed spread of 2. Which broker like this do you recommend ?
15 000$ modelling quality n/a LOL
And EAs with prices like this NEVER show a real signal...
15 000$ modelling quality n/a LOL
And EAs with prices like this NEVER show a real signal...
open prices BT is worthless
open prices BT is worthless
15000???? W T F, everything ok ?
Hello everyone,
you will find both types of backtest for the same peer and during the same period.
you will infer that this ea returns almost the same result for any type of backtest.
File 1 - Type: open prices only (fatest method), modelling quality: n/a
File 2 - Type:every tick (Precise method), modelling quality: 90 %
Hello, A backtest for a long time is better than a real signal. the latter shows efficiency only under current conditions. you can download the demo and do the test. thanks for your intervention.
Of course, who cares real conditions trading ? Better to test with a fixed spread of 2. Which broker like this do you recommend ?