제품을 구매하거나 렌트한 사용자만 코멘트를 남길 수 있습니다
Jesús Jiménez  

Hello!!

I´ve tried testing and results are not the same as image ...

.set file recommended please??? May you upload??

Thanks

Kama Boni  
Kama Boni #:
Strategy is good, but the drawdown is too high for my taste.
Around 51% DD is difficult to manage in real trading.
If DD can be reduced, this EA would be much more attractive.
Thanks for the EA.
Thank you for your honest feedback.
The strategy indeed uses an aggressive recovery mechanism, which can result in higher drawdown during unfavorable market conditions.
We are actively working on optimizing risk management to reduce DD in future updates.
Your input is greatly appreciated
patrickdrew  
Kama Boni #:
Strategy is good, but the drawdown is too high for my taste.
Around 51% DD is difficult to manage in real trading.
If DD can be reduced, this EA would be much more attractive.
Thanks for the EA.
Thanks for the info... :-)
patrickdrew  
Kama Boni #:
Strategy is good, but the drawdown is too high for my taste.
Around 51% DD is difficult to manage in real trading.
If DD can be reduced, this EA would be much more attractive.
Thanks for the EA.
I assume you were using 0.01 to get about -250 in DD?
patrickdrew  
It would be nice to be able to set a fixed LS instead of only as a risk % of balance. 
Le Huy Tuong  
Jesús Jiménez #:

Hello!!

I´ve tried testing and results are not the same as image ...

.set file recommended please??? May you upload??

Thanks

Hello Jesús, thank you for testing and for your feedback.

Please note that results may vary depending on broker conditions, spread, execution, and account type.
We intentionally do not provide a single fixed .set file, as optimal settings depend on risk tolerance and trading environment.

I recommend starting with default risk settings on a demo account and adjusting gradually based on your broker conditions.

Your feedback is very valuable and helps us improve future versions.
Thank you for your interest.

Le Huy Tuong  
patrickdrew #:
It would be nice to be able to set a fixed LS instead of only as a risk % of balance. 
Thank you for the suggestion, patrickdrew.

We understand that some traders prefer fixed lot sizing instead of balance-based risk.
This is a valid request and is being considered as an optional feature in future updates, while still keeping risk control as the primary focus.

We appreciate your constructive input.

Le Huy Tuong  
Kama Boni #:
Strategy is good, but the drawdown is too high for my taste.
Around 51% DD is difficult to manage in real trading.
If DD can be reduced, this EA would be much more attractive.
Thanks for the EA.
Hello Kama, thank you very much for your honest and detailed feedback.

We understand your concern regarding drawdown, especially for real trading conditions.
This feedback is exactly what we are focusing on improving, particularly in terms of risk exposure and capital protection.

Your input has been noted carefully and is helping shape our next development direction.
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience.

Le Huy Tuong  
Thank you all for the valuable feedback on this EA.

Based on the comments regarding drawdown control and stability, we are currently testing a new version called **Edgevia GOLD Trend**, which focuses more on trend confirmation and conservative risk exposure.

If anyone here is interested in providing early feedback or testing this new version on demo, your input would be highly appreciated.
Real user feedback is extremely important for long-term improvement.

Thank you again for your time and constructive discussion.

제품을 구매하거나 렌트한 사용자만 코멘트를 남길 수 있습니다