Before buying, it worked in backtesting, I bought it and it doesn’t work, the author says to change the broker, why would I change the broker, if I tested it for my broker, I asked the author to change it to another expert,
the author is silent.
So future buyers, be careful not to repeat my steps.
The author is a liar and a deceiver, his products should be blocked so as not to mislead buyers and they are not deceived (
Before buying, it worked in backtesting, I bought it and it doesn’t work, the author says to change the broker, why would I change the broker, if I tested it for my broker, I asked the author to change it to another expert,
the author is silent.
So future buyers, be careful not to repeat my steps.
The author is a liar and a deceiver, his products should be blocked so as not to mislead buyers and they are not deceived (
Dear user, I’m sorry to hear about your experience, but I’d like to clarify a few points to ensure fairness and transparency for both myself and future buyers:
Backtesting vs. live performance: Backtesting is a tool to evaluate an algorithm's past performance, but results may vary due to factors such as the quality of historical data, current market conditions, and broker-specific parameters. This is a well-known concept and is clearly explained in the product description.
Broker compatibility: Every broker operates under different conditions, such as spreads, commissions, and execution speeds. If a change of broker is recommended, it’s to ensure the algorithm performs under optimal conditions. This is not "deception" but a transparent acknowledgment of the importance of the trading environment.
Request for modifications: Requests to customize an Expert Advisor fall outside standard support unless explicitly agreed upon at the time of purchase. Nevertheless, I am always available to address technical issues or clarify any concerns you may have.
Unfounded accusations: I understand frustration can occur, but labeling the product as a "scam" without considering the variables mentioned above is neither accurate nor fair. I encourage anyone with doubts to reach out for constructive solutions.
Reputation: My goal is to provide high-quality tools that help traders improve their strategies. My reputation is built on transparency, support, and tangible results.
The result of our conversation is that everyone who purchases a product thinks about trading in real life, right?
Well, backtest and demo means you don’t need it if the product doesn’t work in real life, you need to give people access, at least for 3 days, with trial keys with something, so that every client can test it in real life. In response, I heard change the broker, it should be a shame to answer such a thing.
Tickmill does not work in real life, and let everyone know this.
And you, as the author, should not answer, change your broker, otherwise you are far from the market at all.
Dear user, Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Let me address your concerns clearly and professionally:
Backtesting, demo, and live trading: Backtesting and demo accounts are essential tools to test strategies in controlled environments. However, live trading introduces additional variables like broker execution, spreads, and slippage. This is why results may vary, as stated in the product description.
Trial periods: While offering trial keys might seem like a simple solution, it comes with challenges, including the risk of misuse or unauthorized redistribution of the product. However, I understand the concern, and I’m exploring ways to offer potential buyers more confidence in the product, such as detailed performance documentation or live trade examples.
Broker compatibility: Not all brokers provide the same trading conditions, and this can significantly impact an algorithm’s performance. If Tickmill didn’t yield the expected results in your case, it’s possible that their conditions (e.g., spreads, execution time) are not ideal for this particular strategy. Suggesting a broker change is not meant to dismiss your concerns but to ensure the product operates under optimal conditions.
Professional approach: I strive to maintain a professional and transparent relationship with all users. My primary goal is to help traders achieve success by providing tools that work when used as intended. I regret if my previous response seemed dismissive, but recommending a broker change is a practical step based on experience.
Conclusion: To anyone considering this product, please review the requirements carefully, including broker compatibility, and feel free to reach out with any questions. My commitment is to help you make informed decisions and succeed in your trading journey.
Dear user,
I’m sorry to hear about your experience, but I’d like to clarify a few points to ensure fairness and transparency for both myself and future buyers:
Backtesting vs. live performance:
Backtesting is a tool to evaluate an algorithm's past performance, but results may vary due to factors such as the quality of historical data, current market conditions, and broker-specific parameters. This is a well-known concept and is clearly explained in the product description.
Broker compatibility:
Every broker operates under different conditions, such as spreads, commissions, and execution speeds. If a change of broker is recommended, it’s to ensure the algorithm performs under optimal conditions. This is not "deception" but a transparent acknowledgment of the importance of the trading environment.
Request for modifications:
Requests to customize an Expert Advisor fall outside standard support unless explicitly agreed upon at the time of purchase. Nevertheless, I am always available to address technical issues or clarify any concerns you may have.
Unfounded accusations:
I understand frustration can occur, but labeling the product as a "scam" without considering the variables mentioned above is neither accurate nor fair. I encourage anyone with doubts to reach out for constructive solutions.
Reputation:
My goal is to provide high-quality tools that help traders improve their strategies. My reputation is built on transparency, support, and tangible results.
In response, I heard change the broker, it should be a shame to answer such a thing.
Dear user,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Let me address your concerns clearly and professionally:
Backtesting, demo, and live trading:
Backtesting and demo accounts are essential tools to test strategies in controlled environments. However, live trading introduces additional variables like broker execution, spreads, and slippage. This is why results may vary, as stated in the product description.
Trial periods:
While offering trial keys might seem like a simple solution, it comes with challenges, including the risk of misuse or unauthorized redistribution of the product. However, I understand the concern, and I’m exploring ways to offer potential buyers more confidence in the product, such as detailed performance documentation or live trade examples.
Broker compatibility:
Not all brokers provide the same trading conditions, and this can significantly impact an algorithm’s performance. If Tickmill didn’t yield the expected results in your case, it’s possible that their conditions (e.g., spreads, execution time) are not ideal for this particular strategy. Suggesting a broker change is not meant to dismiss your concerns but to ensure the product operates under optimal conditions.
Professional approach:
I strive to maintain a professional and transparent relationship with all users. My primary goal is to help traders achieve success by providing tools that work when used as intended. I regret if my previous response seemed dismissive, but recommending a broker change is a practical step based on experience.
Conclusion:
To anyone considering this product, please review the requirements carefully, including broker compatibility, and feel free to reach out with any questions. My commitment is to help you make informed decisions and succeed in your trading journey.