TriplE StrategY
99 USD
Versione demo scaricata:
319
Pubblicato:
15 maggio 2019
Versione attuale:
10.5
Non hai trovato un robot adatto?
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Vai alla sezione Freelance
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Come acquistare un Robot di Trading o un indicatore
Esegui il tuo EA
hosting virtuale
hosting virtuale
Prova un indicatore/robot di trading prima di acquistarlo
Vuoi guadagnare nel Market?
Come presentare un prodotto per venderlo con successo
Ti stai perdendo delle opportunità di trading:
- App di trading gratuite
- Oltre 8.000 segnali per il copy trading
- Notizie economiche per esplorare i mercati finanziari
Registrazione
Accedi
Accetti la politica del sito e le condizioni d’uso
Se non hai un account, registrati

Set Files, user may adjust to your taste.
PM me for free 2 weeks trial version.
Happy Trading.
Dear, All
Yesterday, I've loss 3 of my live signals due to XAUUSD. it seem to be my big mistake running XAUUSD during Trade War.
When running all of the 3 strategies (TriplE StrategY; Strategy ONE, TWO, THREE), the Max DD of EU and GU were below 800 usd and now both closed with profits.
However, XaUUSD spike took my account. So, from now, sice my EA is aggrasive, I''l be working on finding the way or method to protect and recovering the account.
In the meanwhile, i would like to reduce the price of all my EAs to 100 usd for each strategy and 250 usd for the full triple strategy with 50% discount.
the price will change back to full price when i can find the account protection solution and wll be increase with regard to the performance of my live signals.
For now, i believe that EU and GU are still safe when runing with 1,000 USD each.
Best regards
PK
New mode "Account Protection" added in Version 5.0+
This AP-function will give ability for user to both automatic and mannual add the hedge and recovery position.
Since Grid system is best when markets are sideway or ranging and when the market gone trending Hedging system will take place to mange all floating position.
The set still need more time to optimized. Now the price will not change for the first adapter. whne the optimization is done the price will change regard its performance.
for now see how my Triple Strategy V5.1 cruise through "Flash Crash" on January 3rd.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-q3QMc-IwY
Hello
I was allowed to use StrategY ONE with a real account, and I increased the assets very smoothly, so I purchased this product today.
I want to use it immediately, but there is a problem, Money Management is functioning in StrategY ONE,
TripleE StrategY will start trading from 0.01lot even if Money Management is set to true.
What's the reason? I want you to use Money Management.
Hello
I was allowed to use StrategY ONE with a real account, and I increased the assets very smoothly, so I purchased this product today.
I want to use it immediately, but there is a problem, Money Management is functioning in StrategY ONE,
TripleE StrategY will start trading from 0.01lot even if Money Management is set to true.
What's the reason? I want you to use Money Management.
Hello, Thank you for purchasing TriplE StrategY.
It is my mistake not active the MM function in TriplE StrategY. The Money Management Function will be in V6.91 which will avaliable in a few hours.
If you have any question or concern, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you and Happy Trading!!!
Ps. if you have a good experience using TriplE StrategY, please kindly share your feedback in the review section. Your opinion matters.
Hello, Thank you for purchasing TriplE StrategY.
It is my mistake not active the MM function in TriplE StrategY. The Money Management Function will be in V6.91 which will avaliable in a few hours.
If you have any question or concern, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you and Happy Trading!!!
Ps. if you have a good experience using TriplE StrategY, please kindly share your feedback in the review section. Your opinion matters.
Thank you for being able to use the MM function.
I'm doing a back test with a setting of 50000 $, but if I change the setting value of "Account Balance to Start MM" to 100000, I will trade 0.01lot, if I set the setting value to 50000, it will be 0.5lot, even 10000 will be 0.5lot Is it possible to say that the set value is reflected because of the transaction?
I'm repeating the test using the set file presented here to see if there are any problems with backtesting, and I'd like to test with a demo account.
In the back test, when AP-Mode is set to true, a huge lot is ordered and bankrupt.
If AP-Mode is set to false, the test is completed without going bankrupt until the end.
As it is, AP-Mode is scary and cannot be used.
Thank you for being able to use the MM function.
I'm doing a back test with a setting of 50000 $, but if I change the setting value of "Account Balance to Start MM" to 100000, I will trade 0.01lot, if I set the setting value to 50000, it will be 0.5lot, even 10000 will be 0.5lot Is it possible to say that the set value is reflected because of the transaction?
I'm repeating the test using the set file presented here to see if there are any problems with backtesting, and I'd like to test with a demo account.
In the back test, when AP-Mode is set to true, a huge lot is ordered and bankrupt.
If AP-Mode is set to false, the test is completed without going bankrupt until the end.
As it is, AP-Mode is scary and cannot be used.
Hello, Nage Isi.
For the MM function i'll check the code as soon as i get back. it mike take a few hours. please accept my apologized for your inconvenient.
fro AP mode. it is the hedging mode to protect the account and also can be use to recovery lossed when the market get trendy. th cincept is like we using grid sysstem duting sideway market.
But, when the market get trendy, the gride system might exepriencing a huge Drawdown. So, hedging can take place and sloved the problem.
However, i'm still working on the AP-mode, trying to addmore function and optimizing the set. all the detail about AP-mode can befound in the EA overview.
so, if you have any suggession to improve the EAs please feel free to advice me.
thank you.
Thank you for being able to use the MM function.
I'm doing a back test with a setting of 50000 $, but if I change the setting value of "Account Balance to Start MM" to 100000, I will trade 0.01lot, if I set the setting value to 50000, it will be 0.5lot, even 10000 will be 0.5lot Is it possible to say that the set value is reflected because of the transaction?
I'm repeating the test using the set file presented here to see if there are any problems with backtesting, and I'd like to test with a demo account.
In the back test, when AP-Mode is set to true, a huge lot is ordered and bankrupt.
If AP-Mode is set to false, the test is completed without going bankrupt until the end.
As it is, AP-Mode is scary and cannot be used.
Hello, again
i found the problem. it seem like i use the worng calculation code for MM function. Fixed and will be in V6.92
so, now if "Account Balance to Start MM = 10,000 and starting lots is 0.01 then the startin lot will double every 10k balance. Ex, 0.02 for 20k balance // 0.05 for 50k balance.
any way please make sure that the starting lot with MM is not exceed "the Maximum lotsize for S-123"
Thank you
Let me write my impression of the backtest.
The currencies are EURUSD and GPDUSD, which are tested in the period 2013-2019. Both have better results if StrategY THREE is set to false.
EURUSD sets AP-Mode "Fix Account Balance" to 0, sets AP-Mode to true, and sets ONE and TWO to true. TWO could not stand the drawdown without AP-Mode.
GPDUSD turned AP-Mode to false, and ONE and TWO alone had excellent results. When testing with AP-Mode set to true, the profit factor decreased, but the net profit increased.
However, backtesting since 1988, AP-Mode has gone bankrupt after trading a huge lot.
I think that it is safer to set "Maximum Lot Size" to AP-Mode, and that person can avoid bankruptcy by using StopLoss function together.
Let me write my impression of the backtest.
The currencies are EURUSD and GPDUSD, which are tested in the period 2013-2019. Both have better results if StrategY THREE is set to false.
EURUSD sets AP-Mode "Fix Account Balance" to 0, sets AP-Mode to true, and sets ONE and TWO to true. TWO could not stand the drawdown without AP-Mode.
GPDUSD turned AP-Mode to false, and ONE and TWO alone had excellent results. When testing with AP-Mode set to true, the profit factor decreased, but the net profit increased.
However, backtesting since 1988, AP-Mode has gone bankrupt after trading a huge lot.
I think that it is safer to set "Maximum Lot Size" to AP-Mode, and that person can avoid bankruptcy by using StopLoss function together.
Thank you, that are very good adds.
it is true that using all 3 strategies together is aggrasive and with AP-mode on think it can be event more aggrasive.
However please let me explain the concept of AP-mode. So, we might found the better way in optimizing it.
At the begining the AP mode was design to slove the problem of grid system that face huge Drawdown when the market become strong trend, that why i choose GJ to test.
when AP mode is on and the account Drawdown percent reach "Protection Start". the AP mode system will sent 2 hedging orders.
the first order, Hedge order, is to balance the buy/sell position, the account will become Full Hedged and stop the drawdown to increase.
the second order. Recovery order. is the recovery position. so if the market keep on trendy, the wining recovery position will recover the losses from S-123.
this process wil reprete every "Protection Step" and it might cause the EA to sent the big lotsize order.
Therefore, there are 2 ways to reduce the lot size of AP mode;
One is to reduce the ""Protection Level" from 100% to may be 50%, however this might make more diffical for AP to recovert the DD from S-123.
Two, the maxlotsize function for AP mode can be added in the next update, but i'm not sure how it will effect the AP system.
Again, thank you very much for sharing. i also develope this ea for personal use. all of the comments are value to improve the EA.
Here, the result of my demo, 90% gain in 2 weeks.
See Setfiles, Attached below;
Currently, i'm using TS V7 S1 SET on my VPS and running TriplE StrategY ADmin Control SET on my labtop for mornitering and interfering if needed.
3つの戦略すべてを一緒に使用すると攻撃的になり、APモードではイベントがより攻撃的になる可能性があると考えられます。ただし、APモードの概念について説明させてください。そのため、最適化の当初、APモードは、市場が強いトレンドになったときに巨大なドローダウンに直面するグリッドシステムの問題を回避するためのAPモードがオンで、アカウントのドローダウン率が「保護開始」に達するとAPのシステムは2つのヘッジ注文を送信します。最初の注文であるヘッジ注文は、買い/売りポジションのバランスを取ることで、アカウントはフルヘッジになり、二次。回復順序。回復位置です。そのため、市場がトレンディな状態を維持する このプロセスはすべての「保護ステップ」を意味し、EAが大きなロットサイズの注文を送信1 つは、「保護レベル」を100%から50%にタイミングことですが、これによりAPがS-する可能性があります。したがって、APモードのロットサイズを削減するには2つの方法があります。 また、個人使用のためにこのEAを開発します。すべてのコメントはEAを改善する価値があります。
Thank you for listening to the idea.
I understand that balancing positions can be a risk hedge.
However, if the market flow is reversed from a position created in AP mode, the drawdown will increase over time.
If StrategY moves to the trend, how about creating “StopLossTimer” in command, AP mode and exiting AP mode?
Thank you for listening to the idea.
I understand that balancing positions can be a risk hedge.
However, if the market flow is reversed from a position created in AP mode, the drawdown will increase over time.
If StrategY moves to the trend, how about creating “StopLossTimer” in command, AP mode and exiting AP mode?
It is true that we never know the market going to move on or get reversed.
For AP-mode there is a function to put stop loss to AP positions. Which are " Place SL fro AP Position = 400" and "SL Target position = 100". in defult setting, when AP mode Activated both Hedge and Recovery positions sent, and if the market move for 400 point then the EA will place the Stop Loss for Hedge and recovery position at 100 positive point.
For StoplossTimer, we already have for S-123, if you wnat to i think i can make it for AP as well.
Thank you.
Happy Trading ^^
with the understanding of news and global situation, can help to improve the performance of the EA in incrasing profit and reducing Drawdown.
Hello, put a set of TSV7S1.set in the demo account has been tested does not go well.
Axiory's ECN account has been tested twice for leverage 400x, 1000 $ and 100,000 $. Is this a problem?
Would you please tell me the leverage value of the account you are using?
Hello, put a set of TSV7S1.set in the demo account has been tested does not go well.
Axiory's ECN account has been tested twice for leverage 400x, 1000 $ and 100,000 $. Is this a problem?
Would you please tell me the leverage value of the account you are using?
Now, Testing V7.4 on my Live Account will Update when Ready!!!
Thank You and Happy Trading!!