First of all, I must say that my English is very poor and I wrote this text with Google Translate. If you see any mistakes in my text, I apologize in advance.
Suppose I have written a simple (MA cross) expert. In the optimization mode in the strategy tester, when I say optize: (1st MA: from 1 to 300) and also (2nd MA: from 1 to 300).
Now the strategy tester has to re-combine and test all the different modes, right? For example: (MA1 with MA2, MA1 with MA3, MA1 with MA4,......)
In other words, the combination of two 300 becomes 90,000 different modes. But I see that the strategy tester checks much less modes.
-----------
Although this is a simple example of what I had in mind, my question is what exactly I need to do to get the strategy tester to check all modes in the optimization phase.
And if it can't possibly do that, do you have any suggestions?
Sometimes I write an expert, when I test it in the strategy tester, I see that it is profitable in the last one year or even two years, but it is unprofitable in the last three or four years. Is this considered a weakness or is it normal for an expert? In other words, should the expert I write be profitable in all the past years? How long ago is the criterion?
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
1:
Suppose I have written a simple (MA cross) expert. In the optimization mode in the strategy tester, when I say optize: (1st MA: from 1 to 300) and also (2nd MA: from 1 to 300).