A variant of the proof of the first axiom of Dow - page 10

 
Aleksandr Praslov:



1. Once again, no one is arguing with you that you can get a specific value of supply and demand from a specific price. No one is arguing because no one has ever argued that.

2. A simple example - the price of the pound collapsed after Brexit. That is, the pound price contains information about Brexit. You can't mathematically get the results of the Brexit referendum from the specific value of the pound price. So the pound price does not contain the results of the Brexit referendum. Bullshit!

 
Дмитрий:

The cost of producing a commodity is a value that does not change after the commodity is released.

And the value of a stock changes over time - the company's property value changes and the number of shares may increase due to an additional issue of shares.


An additional issue can have no effect on the value of a share, so you are lumping everything together with clever and meaningless words.

 
Sergey Chalyshev:

There is no way an additional issue could affect the share price Why are you lumping everything together with clever and meaningless words?


????????? Really? You gave the formula yourself and claim that increasing the denominator has no effect?

I'm not even going to give you examples, just google it.

 
Дмитрий:

????????? Really?


No way,

Do you do the math in your accounting, how much would the book value of the company change with the additional issue?

 
Sergey Chalyshev:

No way,

Go and do the math in your accounting, how much would the book value of the company change in the event of an additional share issue?


))))))) The book value - no way! You increase the denominator (number of shares) and do NOT change the numerator (book value of company assets) - how will the value per share change?

 

How do you get a specific value of supply and demand from the price? Does anyone know? Probably by magic spells?)))

 
Дмитрий:

1. Once again, no one is arguing with you that you can get a specific value of supply and demand from a specific price. No one is arguing because no one has ever argued that.

2. A simple example - the price of the pound collapsed after Brexit. That is, the pound price contains information about Brexit. You can't mathematically get the results of the Brexit referendum from the specific value of the pound price. So the pound price does not contain the results of the Brexit referendum. Bullshit!

The pound price collapsed because the information that the pound would collapse after Brexit was many times greater than the information that the pound would rise after Brexit. Both types of this information can be represented in the form of your curves, the intersection point of which, being the ratio of these rumours, corresponds to the price of the Pound after Brexit.

The pound is not affected by Brexit itself, but by the ratio of information about the rise and fall of the pound after Brexit:)

 
Aleksandr Praslov:

The Pound price collapsed because the information that the Pound would collapse after Brexit was many times greater than the information that the Pound would rise after Brexit. Both types of this information can be represented in the form of your curves, the intersection point of which, being the ratio of these rumours, corresponds to the price of the Pound after Brexit.

The pound was not affected by Brexit itself, but by the ratio of information about the rise and fall of the pound after Brexit:)


And what was the basis for the information that the pound would collapse? Why was there significantly more information in the first minutes AFTER the Brexit results were announced that the pound would collapse than information that it would rise?

That is, is there a link between the Brexit information and the information that the pound would collapse?

 
Дмитрий:

And what was the basis for the information that the pound would collapse? Why was there significantly more information in the first minutes AFTER the Braxit results were announced that the pound would collapse than there was information that it would rise?

On other kinds of information:)
 

Yusuf, put out the professors here hahahaha)))

Reason: