Sparring on MetaQuotes-Demo demo accounts - page 15
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Before the tournament all participants transfer money to the organiser. After the competition and the announcement of the winners of the organizer divides the prize money between the first three places in the proportion 6-3-1.
One - ten times, let's take it, it seems to me, there may be questions to the organizer, the more participants, the more turnovers ...
PS. Is there anyone on the forum who can explain the legal side
Is cheating allowed?)
Five accounts to start with? :) No, these are normal people.
Five accounts to start with? :) No, these are normal people.
No, under the current rules you can win quite legally if you trade FORTS instruments.
Try if these instruments are available on the MetaQuotes-Demo server
Try if these tools are available on the MetaQuotes-Demo server
So, if I take quotes from real (no lag) and trade on MQ-Demo (with 15 min lag) - everything will be OK? Then it's not a competition, but a profanation...
Of course it's not OK. Forts instruments are cancelled, MOEX is not involved in the sparring.
Thank you for the information.
Of course it's not ok . Forts instruments are cancelled, MOEX is not involved in the sparring .
Thanks for the info.
Another idea is to propose that the process be automated by MetaQoutes, which will lead the self-organising process and create a SERVICE FOR CONQUERS. The service will fully automate the process. The process runs, say, once every one, two, or three months, just like a contest in a DILING. A contest can be run for example every 3 months, or every month. The rules are the most democratic, no restrictions to ensure retail: mt4 or mt5, gedge or no hedge, $10,000, leverage 100, trade hands or expert advisors, orders by any amount, the winner is determined by equity.All participants must be registered for a certain date, they bring in for example $10 or $20 to their accounts, no more, it is to provide retail, $100 is more attractive but will not give retail, the amount is frozen until the end of the contest. By the way logic - should be able to use the VPS from MQ, of course for a fee. At the end of the contest, the service will automatically analyze the signals, choose three or five of the best and divide the prize money and automatically credit the first 3 winners or the first 5 with prize money arranged by the participants, in this case, MQ will traditionally take 10% of the prize money. Everything is almost ready for this service, there are signals that can be the main automation of this process, all participants have the ability to deposit accounts and MQ can automatically transfer the prizes. MQ will do it quite well, there is no doubt.
We will wait for the implementation of the project on the basis of MQ, while quietly we will start
There is another idea, to propose this process to be automated by MetaQoutes
It's a good idea. And quite realistic.
Kills a few birds with one stone (sorry, Yuri)
1. Bringing all the participants into one common equity chart (to make it easier to observe the course of the competition).
2. Convenience of service usage.
3. Confidence of the participants to the organizer and guarantee the payment of prizes from the prize fund.
4. Interest of the organizer of the competition.