You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/10910 here indices with a rough count, the trends are clearly visible.
this is bullshit, not an index(. Especially the smoothed line, they've thrown out all the low-frequency info....
this is bullshit, not an index(. Especially the smoothed line, throwing out all the low-frequency info....
Put a period of 1 and all the noise will appear:)
Put in period 1 and all the noise will appear:)
That's not noise, that's info too.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/10910 here indices with a rough count, the trends are clearly visible.
The commentary there is good:
ktest0:
The quality of the description is striking in its depth of thought and coverage of the topic.
I join in.
The commentary there is good:
ktest0:
The quality of the description is striking in its depth of thought and coverage of the topic.
I join in.
Have you even looked at the code? How can I logically justify a hypothesis if, for example, the dollar index is calculated using a formula?
USD^7
iUSD = -----------------------------------------
AUD*CAD*CHF*EUR*GBP*JPY*NZD
0.998683^x + 1.00216908^x+ 1.002040888^x+ 0.998182^x+ 1.003999^x=1
And this x=?Have you even looked at the code? How can I logically justify a hypothesis if, for example, the dollar index is calculated using a formula?
USD^7
iUSD = -----------------------------------------
AUD*CAD*CHF*EUR*GBP*JPY*NZD
It doesn't. Because it doesn't make any sense.
It does make sense, all that's left is to get it right. I will not add a description.
For a solution, go here