Thoughts on the random - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The inefficiency of the market is exposed ...
The mere introduction of the terms efficiency/inefficiency in relation to the market is misleading and misleading. Lies and misinformation have been added to the many layers of the structure of this "hypothesis-theory". This "theory" nonsense was originally intended not to explain but to obfuscate.
The mere introduction of the terms efficiency/ineffectiveness in relation to the market is misleading and misleading. Lies and misinformation have been added to the many layers of the structure of this "hypothesis-theory". This "theory" nonsense was originally designed not to explain but to obfuscate.
You should get married. I know, you don't have to tell me.
The mere introduction of the terms efficiency/ineffectiveness in relation to the market is misleading and misleading. Lies and misinformation are mixed in on many levels of the structure of this "hypothesis-theory". This "theory" was originally intended not to explain but to obfuscate.
My understanding is that this was an attempt by mathematicians to explain the concept of martingale to the non-mathematical crowd (relative to some flow of information, of course).
The explanation turned out to be quite plausible, but not very intelligible.
You should get married. I know, you don't have to say.
Marriage (play in several parts)
As far as I understood it, it was an attempt to explain the concept of martingale (relative to some flow of information) to the non-mathematical crowd.
The explanation was quite plausible, but not very coherent.
what does martingale have to do with it....
Get to the root of it!
what does martingale have to do with it....
Get to the root of it!
Well then tell me how you understand the three degrees of efficiency (weak, medium, strong).
I hope you're not confusing martingale with martingale...
P.S. If you don't want to do it now, do it tomorrow.
As far as I understood it, it was an attempt by mathematicians to explain to the non-mathematical crowd the concept of a martingale (relative to some flow of information, of course).
The explanation turned out to be quite plausible, but not very intelligible.
Alexei, That was your expected explanation.
Alexei, you are, as always, extremely mysterious. It's a turn-on.
I didn't realise when we became "you", by the way...