There are enough investors on the "rollercoaster" who prefer to invest on the expected balance sheet lows. So even a PAMM that pays off the rest is not necessary at all.
So what to do since this is the case? .... Take the EAs from the codebase - open PAMMs - and gobble up the investors' dough?)
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
I do not know about PAMMs, I have 3 managers for two years already.7-10% per month.Invested money has long been worked off.
I do not know about PAMMs, I have 3 managers for two years already.7-10% per month.Invested money has long been worked off.
Well done, at least one participant has taken responsibility.
It's true that the DC is murky, but who doesn't take the risk .....
I don't know about "here", more likely somewhere out there....)))
:-)
tut-tut-tut...
I do not know about PAMMs, I have 3 managers for two years already.7-10% per month.Invested money has long been worked off.
7-10% a month is a realistic percentage to realise. Some people want 100% per month. But greed leads to loss of investment.....)))
Aggregate payback is not necessary at all.
There are enough investors on the "rollercoaster" who prefer to invest on the expected balance sheet lows. So even a PAMM that pays off the rest is not necessary at all.
Well, the main thing is that it is not a dull and steady drain (I remembered "It's not the equity, it's the stability!").
There is a steady demand for rollercoasters. And so - we buy cheap and sell expensive (but according to PAMM balance)...