[ARCHIVE!] Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass by. Can't go anywhere without you - 4. - page 353
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And if there is no chart (optimization), where will the graphics come from?
I see, so we have to make a function that replacesObjectGetValueByShift ! Isn't there a ready-made solution?
Refuse to use objects - wrap everything in indices and use them... Your own - custom ones...
Refuse to use objects - wrap everything in indies and use them... Your own - custom ones...
If your ftp has an http address, i.e. you have your own website, then yes.
And how? You need to put text in the email that will load an http image when you open the email.
<img src="http://adres_saita.com/papka_s_kartinkami/imja_kartinki.gif" width="hor razmer" height="vert razmer" alt="kratkii text (opisanie kartinki)"/>
example - your avatar <img src="https://c.mql4.com/i/avatar/2010/5/36774_1273826964.jpg" width="150px" height="150px" alt="avatara serler_2"/>
Good afternoon to all. I have this question: I am trying to test an EA. I set timeframe M1 (with others about the same) all ticks (the most accurate method). As a result the report shows me that the simulation quality is 24%. Can we trust the results of such a testing? Saw somewhere in the internet charts where it was 99% quality modeling! What should I do so that the tester gives the same quality of simulation?
what is described here http://tradelikeapro.ru/kak-poluchit-kachestvo-modelirovaniya-99/
"The reason is that by default the terminal uses one-minute bars instead of tick data.
And there is nothing to fall back on for 1-minute bars, the terminal does not use tick history.
Therefore the simulation quality higher than 25% cannot be obtained normally on M1.
Suppose we have a triangle with vertices A,B,C. Vertices A and B are fixed to some coordinates and are fixed. By manipulating vertex C, we can change the position of the centre of triangle. Is it possible to create a function in which the coordinates of the triangle's centre are set by the user and the coordinates for point C are calculated by the function itself?
I can't figure out how I can put it all into a single system of calculation, is there a clear example? I know the diameter of the balloon and the height of the flight, but how do I know how much the balloon weighs? I mean time, points and centre :). Can you help me please?
What should I do, translate everything into pixels?
This is far too exotic. At the first level of the question, it is worth explaining why there is a higher modelling quality.
"The reason is that by default the terminal uses minute bars instead of tick data.
And there is nothing further to fall back for 1-minute bars, the terminal does not use tick history.
Therefore the simulation quality higher than 25% cannot be obtained normally on M1.