Copywriting in the advisor - page 7

New comment
 
charter:
If the code within the code can be regarded as a utility model, then the progger has rights to that piece of code.
Well, then let him try to file and obtain a patent first. until then, he does not have any rights to the algorithm.
 
Andrei01:
There is another way out. just change the names of some variables and then it will not be a program of "Vasya Pupkin" and the copyright can be removed because the copyright does not apply to computational algorithms but only to the code as a whole as a "literary" work.
No way. :) Then there must be two authors. As if "made by Vasya Pupkin, modification by Fedor Sumkin". :)
 
charter:
Unless otherwise agreed, all rights are transferred to the client as soon as the acceptance certificate is signed.
Again with reservations about someone else's moped - the source code of the programme is regarded as a work of fiction (!) or something like that.
 
Azzx:
No way. :) Then there would have to be two authors. Like "made by Vasya Pupkin, modification by Fyodor Sumkin". :)

Well, then you could write "based on the works of different authors, the final version by Fedor Sumkin."

It seems that all of them are mentioned then. ))

 
Andrei01:

Well, then you could write "based on the works of different authors, the final version by Fyodor Sumkin".

I think everyone is mentioned then. ))


Not "based on" is different. Like "the algorithm of so-and-so".
 
Azzx:
Not 'based on' is different. Like "the algorithm of so-and-so".
It's not a matter of principle. Already with the copyright, no one will get to the bottom of it.
 
Andrei01:
Why one of the chapters? I will correct everything slightly and it will be a completely different work of literature.

Articles 1255,1266 of the Civil Code guarantee the right to inviolability of a work.

A plagiarist is someone who passes off someone else's work as his own or uses someone else's work in his work without reference to the authors .

 
charter:

Article 1255 of the Civil Code guarantees the right to inviolability of a work.

A plagiarist is someone who passes off someone else's work as his own or uses someone else's work in his works without reference to the authors.

This is considered to be another work. plagiarism is not relevant here at all.
 
Andrei01:
This is already considered a different work. plagiarism is completely out of place here.

You wrote about "editing" the novel War and Peace.

After your "edits" this "work" is indeed not "War and Peace", but it is not your work either.

(Article 1267 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Protection of authorship, name of the author and inviolability of the work after the death of the author)

 
charter:

You wrote about "editing" the novel War and Peace.

After your "edits" this "work" is indeed not "War and Peace", but it is not your work either.

(Article 1267 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Protection of authorship, name of the author and inviolability of the work after the death of the author)

it was not editing and editing. it is a completely new work of authorship. and if there are algorithmic similarities with the previous one, it has a right to be.
12345678
New comment
Reason: