The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 139

 
sergeyas:

The assessment is based on the final profit.

If the specialist screwed up as badly as the worker, the 'specialist' should be more strictly demanded.


I suggested to you: there is a history of 20 years, repeat on the tester the given result of PNB with the help of the TS on the basis of the machine, then we will compare them. Let it be a comparison of virtual trading results. But we should notice the difference, if there is one.
 
FAGOTT:
And I have a sliding window - will the pattern appear in the future or not I do not care. The main thing for me is that it should last at least one more iteration.

Can't you finally state your concept?

No details are allowed.

But perhaps in another thread, I will be curious about it.

Or a link.

ZSU: I'm not kidding.

 
ULAD:
Not exactly a correct statement. You don't know the state of bar -1. which will determine the state of your exponent.

Explain "state of bar -1", please.
 
sergeyas:

The market cannot be 100% predictable, particularly the enemy of any TS.

What are we fighting for?

Statistical advantage, isn't it?


My goal is to determine the probability of a successful entry and exit without losses.

I don't know exactly where the market price will go, but I know exactly where I will buy or sell with minimal probability of loss.

That is the principle of my game.

 
yosuf:
Explain the "bar status -1", please.

1 Bar, which doesn't exist yet. But probably will be... or not)))
 
yosuf:
I suggested to you: there is a 20 year history, repeat on the tester the given result of PNB with a waving machine based TS, then we will compare them. Let it be a comparison of virtual trading results. But we should notice the difference, if there is one.

Come back to the ground. In the tester you will get better results. Who needs it?
 
sergeyas:

Can't you just finally state your concept?

No details are allowed.

I'll be curious about it in another thread.

Or a link.

ZSU: I'm not kidding.


I've been bending over here a long time ago in my thread - take a look.

If you have any questions, ask.

 
ULAD:
Come back down to earth. The tester will show you better results. Who needs it?

The crisis of 2008 will break a lot of TS. Let them show it with a constant 0.1 lot and 3K deposit.
 
yosuf:
The crisis of 2008 will break a lot of TS. Let them show with constant 0.1 lot and 3K deposit.


Dear Yusufhoja, I am not at all a critic of 18 etc. On the contrary. I respect your developments.

Tests from a tester cannot show the quality of their performance and therefore a real, even on a cent will be a better indicator of a successful TS.

 
ULAD:


Dear Yusufhoja, I am not at all a critic of 18 etc. On the contrary. I respect your developments.

Tests from a tester cannot show the quality of their performance, so real even on a cent will be a better indicator of the success of the TS.

Then we will wait for the results of trading on 3 cent accounts, there is no other way.
Reason: