A sub-workshop to fill in the FAQ (frequently asked questions). Let's help comrades! - page 17

 
A common question. You can put it in the FAC as well.
<br / translate="no">Alalpsh 13.05.2011 13:00
Please explain where you can find a description of the detailed Statement's indicators, which are located at the end of it, after the balance chart.
 
granit77:
A common question. You could put it in the FAC.

this question is (long time ago). in the tester section
 
sergeev:


Let's put it this way:

- In terms of convenience and model abstraction, it is better to use arrays.
- For speeding up the work - without arrays.

The relevance of information has nothing to do with it. In both variants - with or without arrays - the relevance is 100% fresh

Saw the QUESTION - decided to check on the merits. The code (in attachment) to check work of variant without arrays ("Tick1" and "Tick2") and with arrays ("Tick3").
What we do: the first time we read market orders and memorize the ticket of the last order in the list; on the next passes we find this ticket in "our lists", write the amount of ticks spent on each operation and compare it.
And here is a print from the account with one open order:
2011.05.13 14:58:14     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:58:14     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 735; Tick2 = 844; Tick3 = 15; 
2011.05.13 14:58:12     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:58:12     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 735; Tick2 = 844; Tick3 = 15; 
2011.05.13 14:58:07     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:58:07     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 687; Tick2 = 797; Tick3 = 16; 
2011.05.13 14:58:01     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:58:01     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 610; Tick2 = 812; Tick3 = 31; 
2011.05.13 14:57:59     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:59     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 890; Tick2 = 782; Tick3 = 15; 
2011.05.13 14:57:56     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:56     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 735; Tick2 = 843; Tick3 = 16; 
2011.05.13 14:57:54     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:54     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 703; Tick2 = 875; Tick3 = 16; 
2011.05.13 14:57:52     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:52     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 610; Tick2 = 828; Tick3 = 15; 
2011.05.13 14:57:49     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:49     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 656; Tick2 = 813; Tick3 = 15; 
2011.05.13 14:57:46     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:46     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 891; Tick2 = 828; Tick3 = 16; 
2011.05.13 14:57:43     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:43     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 719; Tick2 = 828; Tick3 = 15; 
2011.05.13 14:57:41     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:41     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 688; Tick2 = 828; Tick3 = 16; 
2011.05.13 14:57:37     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:37     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 704; Tick2 = 828; Tick3 = 31; 
2011.05.13 14:57:34     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Наменьший результат Tick3 ?!
2011.05.13 14:57:34     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: Tick1 = 906; Tick2 = 813; Tick3 = 750; 
2011.05.13 14:57:10     TestCount_2 NZDUSD,H1: loaded successfully
Interesting result...
Files:
 
IgRU4ek:
I saw the QUESTION and decided to check the essence of it. Attached is the code to test the variant without arrays ("Tick1" and "Tick2") and with arrays ("Tick3").
What we do: the first time we read market orders and memorize the ticket of the last one in the list; on the next passes we find this ticket in "our lists", write the amount of ticks spent on each operation and compare it.
And here is a print from the account with one open order:
Interesting result...

You have a biased assessment.

 
sergeev:

you have a biased assessment.

THE ability of our people to stand up for tchk, which has been imposed on us in one way or another (for us, of course, credible) rather than "touching it with our hands" ourselves... :)))))))))
 
IgRU4ek:
THE COLLUSSION of our people's ability to stand up for the tchk that we have been forced in one way or another (for us, naturally, credible) rather than "touching it with our hands" ourselves... :)))))))))

I've looked at your code. the way you made the assessment shows absolutely nothing.
 

Q: There are indicator files in the experts/indicators folder, but they are not all visible in the terminal.

Answer: Probably, there are too many files in the folder, the terminal shows a limited number. You should free the folder from unnecessary indicators (ex4 and mq4 files).

 
sergeev:
I've looked at your code. the way you've done the assessment shows absolutely nothing.
It already has... ;)
 
IgRU4ek:
He's already shown... ;)

so far he has only shown that you have to watch out for the code.
 
Integer:

Q: There are indicator files in the experts/indicators folder, but they are not all visible in the terminal.

Answer: Probably, there are too many files in the folder, the terminal shows a limited number. You should empty the folder from unnecessary indicators (ex4 and mq4 files).


I have created 350 indices, all of them are shown... I don't see the limit yet... I can certainly stop at 1,000.


Maybe, a user in his right mind would not force the terminal?

Reason: