nikelodeon: A hundred percent there will be a setback... But there will be a correction. Definitely...
If one hundred percent worked, we wouldn't need stop-losses, and everyone would be millionaires long ago. If "One hundred percent" worked, we wouldn't need stop-losses, and everyone would be millionaires long ago))).
It's better to forget about such words in Forex. If "One hundred percent" worked, there would be no need for stop-losses, and everyone would be millionaires long ago)))
I agree, I was wrong....... But everyone understood that the probability is rounded to a hundred :))))) Like a true engineer, I excused myself standing in front of the diploma project examination board: )))))))))))))!!!!!!!!!!!
This branch is very interesting, but too dynamic, while I searched in my system and did find an inaccuracy (that's putting it mildly, the ratios were multiplied backwards) - I missed about 1000 posts. Apparently, a separate thread for "strategists" will do. Too bad I want to test my idea in real time. Now preparing the material, hopefully tomorrow evening will be posted, I will try to keep track of 14 quotes for 20-30 days. Still, I need to "feel" it with my hands.
Farnsworth: This thread is very interesting, but it is very dynamic, while I was searching in my system and found an inaccuracy (to put it mildly, coefficients were multiplied backwards) - I missed about 1000 posts. Apparently, a separate thread for "strategists" will do. Too bad I want to test my idea in real time. Now preparing the material, hopefully tomorrow evening will be posted, I will try to keep track of 14 quotes for 20-30 days. All the same, we need to "feel" it with our hands.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
A hundred percent there will be a setback... But there will be a correction. Definitely...
If one hundred percent worked, we wouldn't need stop-losses, and everyone would be millionaires long ago. If "One hundred percent" worked, we wouldn't need stop-losses, and everyone would be millionaires long ago))).
Here's the forecast https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/126769/page1681 for the week
the first "strategic" pancake turned out to be a bit of a bump in the road:
Here's the forecast https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/126769/page1681 for the week
the first "strategic" pancake turned out to be a bit of a bump in the road:
What about the next one?
It's better to forget about such words in Forex. If "One hundred percent" worked, there would be no need for stop-losses, and everyone would be millionaires long ago)))
I agree, I was wrong....... But everyone understood that the probability is rounded to a hundred :))))) Like a true engineer, I excused myself standing in front of the diploma project examination board: )))))))))))))!!!!!!!!!!!
What about the next one?
This thread is very interesting, but it is very dynamic, while I was searching in my system and found an inaccuracy (to put it mildly, coefficients were multiplied backwards) - I missed about 1000 posts. Apparently, a separate thread for "strategists" will do. Too bad I want to test my idea in real time. Now preparing the material, hopefully tomorrow evening will be posted, I will try to keep track of 14 quotes for 20-30 days. All the same, we need to "feel" it with our hands.
So leave a link to the branch.
So leave a link to the branch.
Still a wolf on H1.
On the H4 it's a channel.
And a big W.
Still a wolf on H1.
On H4 it's a channel.
And a big W.
M is upside down. (The turkeys are inverted...)
i think wolf will not work out his target, end this breakthrough and head south
...and if it does, it's a long way off)