I'm not really looking for a price series wrap. There is already a set of indicators (i.e. a transformed price series), so the dimensionality of this set needs to be reduced.
I recommend that for this purpose you should also consider the possibilities of co-organisation maps. The dimensionality is better reduced with them. They will also highlight the array of states. There is also such a variant of analysis as analysis of independent components. It is much more promising, but so far I have not been able to grasp it to the full extent. If you are interested in the analysis of independent components - let me know.
This is what a mathematician friend wrote to me when asked how to get rid of input correlation:
"The principal component method seems to be it. Here is a more or less accessible description: http://www.statsoft.ru/home/ textbook/modules/stfacan.html. How effective it is in your case, I don't know. But linear correlation should eliminate it well. "
PCA is data transformation and dimensionality reduction, i.e. after data transformation we find the best new input data (according to the criterion).
If you need to select non-correlated data from the initial data, then multivariate regression rules. For example, if you have a set of indicators, you can carefully run a multivariate regression in a statistical program and find the right set of indicators.
IlyaA писал(а)>> I also recommend you to look into the possibilities of soma-organization maps for this purpose. Dimensionality is better reduced with them. They will also select the array of states. There is also such variant of analysis as analysis of independent components. It is much more promising, but so far I have not been able to grasp it to the full extent. If you are interested in the analysis of independent components - let me know.
Self-organisation maps will be considered if the PCA fails.
I have heard about independent component analysis, but have not understood what it is in detail.
Now I plan to implement PCA based on my own matrix library.
So I must have used it incorrectly, or prepared it.
I myself have worked with picture compression. Sometimes the error is zero, sometimes not, depending on the degree of compression (number of principal components) and the informativeness of the inputs.
Try with simple examples.
Works great on attractors :) I haven't tried it on pictures. I think the question is the structure of the row. I haven't pre-processed it.
I suggested a variant without fitting. Fitting implies adjusting to a test set, and here the finished system is just tested on it. If you don't want to use it, don't use it, it's up to you.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
I'm not really looking for a price series wrap. There is already a set of indicators (i.e. a transformed price series), so the dimensionality of this set needs to be reduced.
I recommend that for this purpose you should also consider the possibilities of co-organisation maps. The dimensionality is better reduced with them. They will also highlight the array of states. There is also such a variant of analysis as analysis of independent components. It is much more promising, but so far I have not been able to grasp it to the full extent. If you are interested in the analysis of independent components - let me know.Here are a couple of books on optimisation. Just downloaded, still hot.
........ can't seem to attach. I got it from http://torrents.ru.
You could have clarified the direction a little bit.You could have clarified the direction a bit.
On demand "optimisation":
http://torrents.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1591908e
http://torrents.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2139370e
http://torrents.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1327023e
http://torrents.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=711214e
http://torrents.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2346898e
http://torrents.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2123107e
Thanks joo. Intriligator was my board book. :) Check it out, I mean, study the material.
This is what a mathematician friend wrote to me when asked how to get rid of input correlation:
"The principal component method seems to be it. Here is a more or less accessible description: http://www.statsoft.ru/home/ textbook/modules/stfacan.html. How effective it is in your case, I don't know. But linear correlation should eliminate it well. "
I'll look into it.
PCA is data transformation and dimensionality reduction, i.e. after data transformation we find the best new input data (according to the criterion).
If you need to select non-correlated data from the initial data, then multivariate regression rules. For example, if you have a set of indicators, you can carefully run a multivariate regression in a statistical program and find the right set of indicators.
I also recommend you to look into the possibilities of soma-organization maps for this purpose. Dimensionality is better reduced with them. They will also select the array of states. There is also such variant of analysis as analysis of independent components. It is much more promising, but so far I have not been able to grasp it to the full extent. If you are interested in the analysis of independent components - let me know.
Self-organisation maps will be considered if the PCA fails.
I have heard about independent component analysis, but have not understood what it is in detail.
Now I plan to implement PCA based on my own matrix library.
The calculation was done in excel.
Tough :)
the calculation was done in excel.
Tough :)
That's another thing... I'm catching myself thinking that I've started programming strength calculations in my head in MQL5.... :)
So I must have used it incorrectly, or prepared it.
I myself have worked with picture compression. Sometimes the error is zero, sometimes not, depending on the degree of compression (number of principal components) and the informativeness of the inputs.
Try with simple examples.
Works great on attractors :) I haven't tried it on pictures. I think the question is the structure of the row. I haven't pre-processed it.
I agree with iliarr. It's gonna be a fit.