Stochastic indicator. A curious observation. - page 16

 

also a variation on the superstoch theme... interesting method (it's a pity that it doesn't work in all cases... and not always applicable ... and also with the "blind spot" ...)

 
fxxx >> :

also a little on the subject from FF


Read more than once, though after trying a similar method myself! There's more work to be done, of course!

 
Paha >> :

I've read about it more than once, but only after I tried a similar method myself! There's more work to be done, of course!

>>...the work has been done but no clear results have been obtained...

 
sllawa3 писал(а) >>

covered the drawdown (below 20 and above 80 )... but the dead zone (20 - 80 on m1 ) is still there... any thoughts on this ?

yeah... sorry Slava, no thoughts ; but I can write lots of links...

but I've got something good to say... : ((((((((((

 
fxxx >> :

yeah... Sorry, Slava, 0ziro (thoughts) ; but I can throw a lot of links...

but to say something sensible... : ((((((((((

AY...GENTLEMEN AND COMRADES ! I HAVE AN IDEA... The gist is this: open on conditions but not estimated and the minimum lot ... and addition works estimated ... but not just when the order went into drawdown ( then close it and opens additive) but in the case of the correct movement, too ... how do you such an idea? ?

 
sllawa3 >> :

AY... GENTLEMEN AND COMRADES ! I HAVE AN IDEA... The gist is this: open on conditions but not estimated and the minimum lot ... and addition works estimated ... but not just when the order went into drawdown ( then close it and opens additive) but in the case of the correct movement, too ... how do you such an idea? ?

my question to the experts : how to implement stochastic on the tick chart ? ( is it possible without writing ticks to an array ?)

 
sllawa3 писал(а) >>

Question to connoisseurs : how to implement a stochastic on a tick chart ? ( is it possible without writing ticks to an array ?)

Files:
 
DimDimychhh >> :

thank you so much !

 

Good afternoon! Read the thread and decided to try it. I have tried it, but I got errors in strategy tester logging:

2009.02.08 23:16:31 2008.10.03 10:15 StochasticPRO EURUSD,M5: trade_lib&info_lib - _OrderSend ( EURUSD, 1, 0.10, 1.38600, 5, 1.38650, 1.38550, StochasticPRO (EURUSD, M5), 1135, 0, 255 ) - _OrderSend_Check() - Invalid trade parameters. Working time: 0 sec.
2009.02.08 23:16:31 2008.10.03 09:55 StochasticPRO EURUSD,M5: trade_lib&info_lib - _OrderSend ( EURUSD, 1, 0.10, 1.38340, 5, 1.38390, 1.38290, StochasticPRO (EURUSD, M5), 1135, 0, 255 ) - _OrderSend_Check() - Invalid trade parameters. Work time: 0 sec.


and does not open any order. Help me get it running! Thank you!

 
EgorD >> :

Good afternoon! Read the thread and decided to try it. I've got everything hooked up but in strategy tester I get errors in logs:

2009.02.08 23:16:31 2008.10.03 10:15 StochasticPRO EURUSD,M5: trade_lib&info_lib - _OrderSend ( EURUSD, 1, 0.10, 1.38600, 5, 1.38650, 1.38550, StochasticPRO (EURUSD, M5), 1135, 0, 255 ) - _OrderSend_Check() - Invalid trade parameters. Working time: 0 sec.
2009.02.08 23:16:31 2008.10.03 09:55 StochasticPRO EURUSD,M5: trade_lib&info_lib - _OrderSend ( EURUSD, 1, 0.10, 1.38340, 5, 1.38390, 1.38290, StochasticPRO (EURUSD, M5), 1135, 0, 255 ) - _OrderSend_Check() - Invalid trade parameters. Work time: 0 sec.


and does not open any order. Help me get it running! >> Thank you!

NO DATA FROM THE CONDITIONS... MAYBE THERE IS A DISCREPANCY WITH THE NAME OF INDUCTOR OR LOT ASSIGNMENT ERROR... IF THE RISK OF 0 AND WORKING AT 10 OR 100 DOES NOT WORK, THEN THE LEVERAGE CONDITION IS NOT SATISFIED (MISMATCH BETWEEN THE MARKED IN THE EA AND WHAT IS ACTUALLY THERE) MY ICQ 358 376 421 ON DEFAULT IN THE LEVERAGE 1/500 AT RISK = 10 THE VARIABLE DEPOSIT AND NEED TO PRESCRIBE A LEVERAGE OPEN ACCOUNT 100-500 (SIGNIFIES PART OF THE INVOLVED DEPT EG 0.1 ) AT RISK=100 LOT = FUNDRAISING (FREE MARGIN) DIVIDED BY 100 (ONLY WORKS WITH 1/500 LEVERAGE)

AT RISK = 0 - CONSTANT LINEAR SET LOT (LOTS) AND AT RISK 0.01 TO 1 THE RISK CALCULATION TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE PREVIOUS POSITIONS

Reason: