FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2016 - page 1120

 
new-rena:
What did you want)))) who was blowing the trumpet to buy? So they should have been kneed, both of them))
You mean you shouldn't have?)))
 
Movlat Baghiyev:
So you shouldn't have?)))

No one will answer that question for you yet. The future will show)))

There's no point in worrying about it before it's time.

 

Yeah, I think I'll give up on predictions. They don't seem to be adequately evaluated. )))

 
max325:

Yeah, I think I'll give up on predictions. They don't seem to be adequately evaluated. )))

It's just that the putocolliers have proven once again that their system is inadequate.
 
Movlat Baghiyev:
You mean you didn't have to?)))

Planned action.

Do you think the Central Bank of England was unaware and Theresa spoke in the mood?

The timing was deliberate.)

 
On my system, the buy triggered at 1.2826
 
new-rena:
It's just that the ptokolniks have once again proved the failure of their system. it has nothing to do with you.
what's your point? =)
 
Roman Busarov:
what's your point? =)

I'm not talking about you. Be cool.)

You reduced the risk, and pako was selling, I remember.

 
new-rena:

I'm not talking about you. Be cool.)

you decreased the risk and pako sold, i remember

i also sold =) i even showed the zone where to sell =)

It's not critical, even at parity =)

i showed the start of normal purchases i had to start with... but as the squares are drawn in advance, the buying zone shifted to 2850-2820... but then again, i showed it later and announced the levels where one can really get down...

 
Roman Busarov:
so i was selling too =) and i even showed the zone where to sell =)

ah, well thanks then. it means life will get better, not all is lost yet))))