Code Base licences - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's exactly what I mean, I don't see any understanding of this issue from the users on the forum itself.
That's why I want an answer from the admins (in the sense of a responsible answer).
Help me to voice the right question.
I made a contract in which I stipulated that all the rights to the program codes, which I must subsequently transfer, must initially belong to me. But I have used the graphics library available in the database, which is about 2% of the program's logic. How much lawful and correct the contract I made and whether there are any consequences because it is said that if the authorship of at least part of the code belongs to a third party, the customer is entitled to demand a refund and payment of all legal costs if such a dispute arises.
The topicstarter asked the wrong question in his head.
Well solving any problem starts with finding out the right question.
What do you think the right question is?
Help me to voice the right question.
I made a contract in which I stipulated that all the rights to the program codes, which I must subsequently transfer, must initially belong to me. But I have used the graphics library available in the database, which is about 2% of the program's logic. How much lawful and correct the contract I have signed and whether the consequences are not fraught with, since it is said that if the authorship of at least part of the code belongs to a third party, the customer has the right to demand a refund and payment of all legal costs if such disputes arise.
Probably, you mean that you are the copyright holder of the code (the authorship doesn't matter), but you can't be the copyright holder of the code from the codebase in any way. However, you have the wording "originally", which implies that both author and copyright holder are the same person (that ownership was not transferred).
If that's how you originally drafted the contract, why on earth would you decide to use someone else's code?
Well solving any problem starts with finding out the right question.
What do you think the right question would be?
Joo Zepper!
If you are so bothered by this question, then rewrite this 2% code yourself!
After all, the main thing is the IDEA, not the way to implement it.
It's like this: "Can I assemble the codes from the code base, compile them in my own way and sell them in the marketplace and won't I get a headache later ????".
...
After all, it's the IDEA that counts, not the way it's implemented.
This is where you are very wrong. Ideas are not protected by copyright. They are protected by copyright.