improvai
improvai
improvai
improvai
new scamming is going through by the help of this broker, all high growth signal r from this one, and ppl r suffering,
improvai
improvai
i have n idea what kind of calculation use here to determine signal ranking or reliability, but obviously that is miscalculated and leading ppl to join in low quality signal.

whenever a signal get more subscriber get high in ranking, seriously dose this can a valid logic for ranking. also with 90+% drawdown signal has higher reliability here as well.



whenever wrote about signal related issue post were deleted, but my concern is if we cant post here than where should we write, bcz biggest scam is doing through this signal by explicating sites loophole by scam traders
improvai
improvai
is there any signal provider who can give guarantee if s/he can failed to achieve certain % than s/he will refund the subscription fee ?



bcz so far found there are so many high return earning signal with past record but when they start to sell signal in mql their return suddenly shanked by huge difference. so im planning to join such signal provider who has such gut that s/he can ensure certain % return on month or subscription fee will be refunded so that we cant loose our fee at least with scam signal.
improvai
improvai 2020.08.22
here found 1 which offers signal fee guarantee: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/767561
improvai
improvai
this is common practice is mql5 signal section that scam signal provider are taking the advantage of mql5 loophole. every quarter subscribers are loosing tons of thousand of dollars because of these scam signal providers the recent cases are:



https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/768575 == NoLimit

https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/768578 == SCM

https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/746137 == New Future

https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/746943 == Alexandra IcM

https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/746136 == Alexandra Legacy





what is the loophole of mql5?



loophole is that when a signal provider attached an account with past history mql5 couldn't detect the floating drawdown of past history. and these scammers are taking the advantages of this. earlier these scammers came up with 1000+% growth in one month in their past record then mql5 applied a rules that anything above 200% growth marked as risky and removed that record from history. so now they are coming with lower or around than 200% growth per month history with very low DD.

this is happening for years if any one check the history ull find that the common pattern of this kind of scam has these similarities:



1. started with low amount

2.before adding their acc in mql5 their account growth was very high more than 100% or similar per monht

3. very low drawdown comapre to te growth. mostly less than 10%

4. all account with unknown or very poor rating brokers

5. after attaching the the account growth decreses by large

6. and within 6 month they destroyed by crazy trading



i think mql5 should stop this kind of thing by applying simple rules.



1. past record wont count so when a signal provider attach an account record will be starting from then

or

2.if they have to keep past record than they should trace the floating DD of that record, currently mql can rack only DD of accrued trade.( means DD happened by closed trade) .
improvai
improvai
risky trading policy applied on this mql platform for those who gained 200% on given month and those gain always removed from history. but for these 2 signals for unknown reason those risky gain wasn't remove yet. is there any changes on mql on

https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/768575

https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/746137
improvai
improvai
why mql5 is not stopping past history?

in this week few top ranking signals those have more than 500+ followers are crashed down again. all are with fake past history. and finally what was due is happened his week. there are few broker which are helping scammers or they are doing those scams again and again. they provide highly profitable signal to attract people and can continue those signal hardly 3-6 months.

i wrote several times to mql5 support to stop allowing the past record of any signal like zulu dose. so that fake history will not attract people and follower can find only true signal provider here. but they are not interested to do so. so i think we people should raise our voice again to stop acepting past history of any signal provider.

signal providers performance will be started as soon as s/he linked trading account on mql5 , earlier data wount be shown here. by doing only this we can be safe from scammers.
improvai
improvai
please check this fake signal and stay from them as well::


https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/394440
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/394463
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/396049
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/407574
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/424255
similarities are:

1. same broker
2. deposit very small amount (both has 100 usd, but it is 10 usd as they are having cent account. ) FXOpen-Real2 this server porvides cent acc u can check with broker.
3. same trading pattern. with initial deposit trades few months no of trade is low gain is high also dd is low

4. thne load up up by large deposit
5. after that so many small trades and both cases similar amount of tp which is 3usd for every trade.
6. after adding the acc in mql monthly growth fall significantly and increase the dd.


still do u think these accounts have true track record?

they are working for borker and now just stealing subscribers fund very soon this signal will be in loss.

try to avoid those signal which has past record before adding acc in mql.

and we should knock mql team to stop allowing this kind of acc for paid signal as they did for cent account.
improvai
improvai
please check this signal provider as well::


https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/394440
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/394463
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/396049
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/407574
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/424255
similarities are:

1. same broker
2. deposit very small amount (both has 100 usd, but it is 10 usd as they are having cent account. ) FXOpen-Real2 this server porvides cent acc u can check with broker.
3. same trading pattern. with initial deposit trades few months no of trade is low gain is high also dd is low

4. thne load up up by large deposit
5. after that so many small trades and both cases similar amount of tp which is 3usd for every trade.
6. after adding the acc in mql monthly growth fall significantly and increase the dd.


still do u think these accounts have true track record?

they are working for borker and now just stealing subscribers fund very soon this signal will be in loss.

try to avoid those signal which has past record before adding acc in mql.

and we should knock mql team to stop allowing this kind of acc for paid signal as they did for cent account.
improvai
improvai
please check this signal provider as well::


https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/394440
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/394463
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/396049
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/407574
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/424255
similarities are:

1. same broker
2. deposit very small amount (both has 100 usd, but it is 10 usd as they are having cent account. ) FXOpen-Real2 this server porvides cent acc u can check with broker.
3. same trading pattern. with initial deposit trades few months no of trade is low gain is high also dd is low

4. thne load up up by large deposit
5. after that so many small trades and both cases similar amount of tp which is 3usd for every trade.
6. after adding the acc in mql monthly growth fall significantly and increase the dd.


still do u think these accounts have true track record?

they are working for borker and now just stealing subscribers fund very soon this signal will be in loss.

try to avoid those signal which has past record before adding acc in mql.

and we should knock mql team to stop allowing this kind of acc for paid signal as they did for cent account.
improvai
Hat sich auf MQL5.community registriert