You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
1) To be precise, by "Transaction Outcome Statistics" I mean exactly the Outcome Statistics (not price, not balance, not anything else). I feel safer that way.
And for "arguing"... - so let's take something specific... and proceed...
Calmer is subjective. :) But realistically - how is the price on the chart different from some TC? :)
I will show one more chart (there are many of them):
It is visually clear that the flip is practically a deal on a deal. But the result gives not profit, as would be expected, but a loss!
Bring your version of the flip, pls!
Direct
reverse
And what is a flip of the terms?
On a buy-sell condition. This is understandable.
When we reach N% loss, start reducing losing trades change to: when we reach N% profit, increase the number of trades? Trelling profitable positions to what do we change it to? etc.
DJDJ22, you clearly have two counter agreed TCs. Or one TC with counter poses. I suggest that you don't consider that at this point.
And what is a flip of the terms?
On a buy-sell condition. This is understandable.
When we reach N% loss, start reducing losing trades change to: when we reach N% profit, increase number of trades? Trelling profitable positions to what do we change it to? etc.
Visually, it is clear that the flip is practically a trade in a trade. But the result is not a profit, as would be expected, but a loss!
Bring your version of the flip, pls!
That's the way it should be. Even Grandpa Krylov said:
And you friends, no matter how you sit down, it's the Colorado beetle that eats the spread.
Calmer is subjective. :) But realistically - how is the price on the chart different from some TC? :)
I will show one more chart (there are a lot of them):
It is visually clear that the flip is practically a deal on a deal. But the result gives not profit, as would be expected, but a loss!
Bring your version of the flip, pls!
The price on the chart MAY differ from the Outcome Statistics in any way: the slope, the width of the channel, the degree of stability of some parameter.
The biggest advantage of Outcome Statistics over price is the FABILITY to CONTROL the characteristics (you can't control it with price).
And why do you need my version of the flip...? Let's better see how you can manipulate the variant you don't like...
Choose your data, post it here and "let's go"...
Pick your data, post it here and - "here we go"...
Sorry, but I don't see the point yet. "Boosting" both of these falling curves using outcome statistics is of course possible. This is clear and I have given examples: 1 and 2.
But what is the point in"In the second case, trade against your TS signals - and also enjoy life" if the resulting statistics are also unprofitable with a very high degree of probability?
That is, just trading against - there is no guarantee that you'll make a profit. You have to manage your lot as well. But then the point of "flipping"?
I would still like to see your version of the flip.
And you friends, no matter how you sit down, the Colorado beetle will eat the spread.