Zhuo Kai Chen / 个人资料
- 信息
|
1 年
经验
|
0
产品
|
0
演示版
|
|
1
工作
|
0
信号
|
0
订阅者
|
Computer Science Bachelor in CUHK(SZ)
Quant Researcher with 3+ years of trading experience
Currently managing 5+ trading systems
Specializes in CTA strategy development
Github: https://github.com/CodyOutcast
Quant Researcher with 3+ years of trading experience
Currently managing 5+ trading systems
Specializes in CTA strategy development
Github: https://github.com/CodyOutcast
Zhuo Kai Chen
I personally have some critical thoughts about developing machine learning models as filters for trend-following strategies. We all know that trend-following strategies primarily profit from a few outlier trades that offset most of the losses. This characteristic of profit distribution is difficult to capture with a binary classifier. While we can attempt to minimize this issue by assigning greater weight to the higher profit class, it remains challenging. Intuitively, predicting long-term profits is akin to forecasting prices, which academia often regards as a mystery. Dr. Ernest P. Chan, the author of "Quantitative Trading", stated that using tree models to predict short-term prices is much easier than predicting long-term prices—similar to how forecasting the weather for the next minute is easier than predicting it for tomorrow. I strongly agree and have found success using such models to predict short-term mean reversion strategies.
Recently, a fund manager from Man Group gave a lecture about CTAs (Commodity Trading Advisors) at my university. He mentioned that they rarely use machine learning in their CTA bots, which baffled me. Literally, one of the most successful firms in the world prefers simple rules and intuitive algorithms over sophisticated methods. I asked him why, and he explained:
1. They tried using machine learning to mine alphas but failed miserably.
2. They attempted to use it as a filter, similar to what we discussed in this article, but it barely worked, achieving only 80% correlation. This means it provided almost no additional edge compared to the original strategy.
3. They found success in using machine learning to select the best strategy for a given market.
Regarding the third point, I wondered why they didn’t simply test each strategy for every market and compare the results. However, I assume they find it more efficient to cluster markets for certain strategies, especially since they trade over 6,000 assets. They believe the aforementioned theory explains their obstacles, as they primarily use trend-following strategies for their CTA bots.
Recently, a fund manager from Man Group gave a lecture about CTAs (Commodity Trading Advisors) at my university. He mentioned that they rarely use machine learning in their CTA bots, which baffled me. Literally, one of the most successful firms in the world prefers simple rules and intuitive algorithms over sophisticated methods. I asked him why, and he explained:
1. They tried using machine learning to mine alphas but failed miserably.
2. They attempted to use it as a filter, similar to what we discussed in this article, but it barely worked, achieving only 80% correlation. This means it provided almost no additional edge compared to the original strategy.
3. They found success in using machine learning to select the best strategy for a given market.
Regarding the third point, I wondered why they didn’t simply test each strategy for every market and compare the results. However, I assume they find it more efficient to cluster markets for certain strategies, especially since they trade over 6,000 assets. They believe the aforementioned theory explains their obstacles, as they primarily use trend-following strategies for their CTA bots.
分享社交网络 · 4
Zhuo Kai Chen
已发布文章利用CatBoost机器学习模型作为趋势跟踪策略的过滤器
CatBoost是一种强大的基于树的机器学习模型,擅长基于静态特征进行决策。其他基于树的模型,如XGBoost和随机森林(Random Forest),在稳健性、处理复杂模式的能力以及可解释性方面具有相似特性。这些模型应用广泛,可用于特征分析、风险管理等多个领域。在本文中,我们将逐步介绍如何将训练好的CatBoost模型用作经典移动平均线交叉趋势跟踪策略的过滤器。
分享社交网络 · 2
668
: