Fxhealer 0226

As written on May 10 and edited on May 12, 2026:

I've been following this signal for a week, and I got 7 trades so far - 3 closed in profit and 4 losses. Looking at my trades history, 6 of them had SL/TP set, one did not - but I'm sure it was closely monitored as it was opened briefly as a concurrent second/recovery trade. The SL levels are such that each trade was risking about $15 to $25 on a $300 balance. The profit potential was similar, but 2 of the 3 profit trades were closed before reaching TP, which is fine.

The recent daily loss (approximately from $300 to $250 on the signal account) is indeed unfortunate (especially for recent subscribers who didn't yet accumulate profit), but I disagree with Jaack's review - it's not crazy. These trades were not unusual, a few consecutive losses and no wins on a given day could always happen. The trader did not go into excessive risks in an attempt to recover, I appreciate that. There will be opportunities to try and recover on other days - which again may be successful or not.

Considering the above and that the description doesn't describe much (it only says "Manual trade with passion & purpose"), I rate "trade system reliability and description quality" 4/5.

Separately, I'm a bit concerned the signal account's balance is so small, which can mean a variety of possibilities most of which are not reassuring to a subscriber, especially not when investing a significantly larger amount.

The trades were copying well for me (to another broker, in a VPS), but (update on May 12) the signal got disconnected from the copying service last night - my MQL5 VPS is trying and failing to connect to the signal server, and data on the MQL5 website looks stale (last night's trade is seen simultaneously as still open and as closed in profit). I don't know if the "copying quality" rating here is supposed to reflect things like that, but I lowered it from 5/5 to 4/5 for this reason, so that if the signal comes back it would be known that it has a history of getting disconnected (and if it doesn't come back, I suppose it'd get deleted from the system anyway, so no reason for a lower rating).

I tried messaging the provider here on May 8, which is now (edited) 4 days ago, just to provide encouragement (after the large daily loss and bad review) and see if I get any response, but my message isn't read yet. So I assume there's no user support, or at least you shouldn't expect to receive support promptly - that's fine, but since we have a separate star rating for that metric, I have to set it to 1/5 for now.

With this, the average rating per my review comes out as 3/5, and with the other (unfair) review it's 2/5 for both combined. I think that isn't fair. If I were to rate this signal as a whole, assuming the copying issue is resolved, I'd give it 4/5 for small subscriber balances (say, up to $1k or 3x the signal account's balance) and 3/5 for larger balances. However, I use the individual ratings the way they're meant to be, not adjusting to achieve a desired outcome.

Update on May 15 and May 18, 2026:

I contacted MQL5 support and they seem to have fixed the signal connection issue (after a couple of days). However, we now see that the signal account went into further drawdown while it was disconnected (we were lucky that it was!), now 46% by balance. This suggests the unlucky trades are becoming more of a pattern, so I've also lowered that rating to 2/5.

My direct message to the signal provider here remains unread after 10 days, so the user support rating rightly remains at 1/5.

The trade copying quality rating remains at 4/5 since the trades were copying well but there was this signal connection issue, which may or may not repeat... and it did repeat today (May 18).

I am not going to continue following this signal, just writing this update for the community.

Why did you turn crazy! 15+% loss in one day. Past few month performance was just deception. How unstable is your strategy is clear now.