Jang Jun / Profil
- Informations
|
Aucun
expérience
|
3
produits
|
25
versions de démo
|
|
0
offres d’emploi
|
1
signaux
|
0
les abonnés
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
👤 Independent algorithmic trader
📅 ~20 years in trading & EA development
📊 MARKETS
▸ XAUUSD (Gold)
▸ BTC
▸ Crude Oil (expanding)
🛡️ MY TRADING PHILOSOPHY
✅ No Grid
✅ No Martingale
✅ Fixed Stop-Loss on every trade
→ Every loss is defined before entry.
🔍 VERIFIED APPROACH
▸ Full continuous historical backtests
▸ Live on real accounts & prop firm capital
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💬 Feel free to message me anytime.
Ajoutez des amis via leur profil ou une recherche d'utilisateur et vous pourrez voir s'ils sont en ligne
Week 1 After the Upgrade: A Tough Start — and Why I'm Staying the Course
- New strategy added for more diversification.
- Improved exit protection.
- Stable lot sizing during drawdown.
No setting changes required.
What's new:
- New low-frequency strategy module added for extra diversification.
- Improved exit management with break-even protection.
- Lot sizing now stays at the base level during drawdown,
so the strategy works exactly as designed.
- Better stability after terminal / VPS restart.
No changes to required settings.
Simply update and reattach to the XAUUSD M5 chart.
Thank you for your support!
All three editions have been updated to v1.40.
- One internal strategy module has been upgraded.
Backtests show more consistent results across brokers
and lower sensitivity to spread.
- Restart safety improved: daily trading state is preserved
after terminal/VPS restarts, preventing duplicate entries.
- Other modules and risk settings are unchanged.
The update is free and automatic.
After updating (Market tab > Update), please remove and
re-attach the EA on your chart so the new version runs.
Open positions continue to be managed normally.
Questions? Send me a private message anytime.
Improved exit logic (trend-following component)
The partial-exit timing of one of the internal strategies has been refined. Profits are now secured earlier on a portion of the position, while the remaining portion keeps following the trend as before.
In our tests over the same period, overall profit stayed virtually unchanged, while the strategy's floating drawdown was reduced and the recovery factor improved.
Lot calculation fix
Fixed a rare rounding issue in partial closing that could, at certain lot multipliers, close a slightly smaller volume than intended. Partial closes now always match the intended volume.
No changes to settings
Input parameters, risk structure, and stop-loss protection remain the same.
No grid, no martingale. Every position is protected by a fixed stop-loss.
Simply replace the old file with v1.30. Open positions will continue to be managed normally.
One Strategy, Three Grades: How to Choose the Right GoldDragon
Compounding Is Not Martingale: The Same Strategy, Two Very Different Numbers
Why My Profit Factor Is Only 2.0 — And How to Spot a Martingale EA
🐉 GoldDragon Standard — XAUUSD Multi-Strategy Expert Advisor Balanced Grade (10x) 🔥 LAUNCH TESTER PRICE — FIRST 5 BUYERS ONLY: $397 Then $497 (first month) → $697 (month 2) → $1,297 (final price). The earlier you buy, the cheaper it is. Your price never changes after purchase. ⚠️ PLEASE READ THIS FIRST No system wins every trade. Losing periods, drawdown expansion, and quiet stretches with no entries are all normal. Do not judge this system by a few days or a few trades — give it at least one
🐉 GoldDragon Aggressive — XAUUSD Multi-Strategy Expert Advisor Maximum Growth Grade (20x) 🔥 LAUNCH TESTER PRICE — FIRST 5 BUYERS ONLY: $497 Then $597 (first month) → $897 (month 2) → $1,597 (final price). The earlier you buy, the cheaper it is. Your price never changes after purchase. ⚠️ PLEASE READ THIS FIRST No system wins every trade. Losing periods, drawdown expansion, and quiet stretches with no entries are all normal. Do not judge this system by a few days or a few trades — give it at
I wrote something a bit different this time — less about numbers, more about
the years I spent losing money before any of this worked.
My first serious loss came from a system that looked perfect. Smooth curve,
high win rate, small drawdown. It ran beautifully for four months, then took
most of the account in under two weeks. It took me far too long to understand
why: the curve had not been smooth because the strategy was good. It had been
smooth because the losses were being deferred.
The post covers:
- The structural mistake I repeated more than once
- The four rules I will not break, even when breaking them makes the backtest
look better
- Three questions I wish someone had made me ask fifteen years ago, before
buying any automated system
No promises in there, and nothing to buy. Just the part nobody publishes.
👉 https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/776007
And if you missed the first post — on why my Profit Factor is 1.9, and how to
check whether any EA is really running martingale underneath:
👉 https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/775995
Trade carefully out there. 🐉
20 Years, One Rule: What I Learned From the Accounts I Blew Up
Why My Gold EA Shows Profit Factor 1.9 — And Why I'm Not Hiding It
The screenshot below is not my best result. It is my most honest one.
It is GoldDragon running with a FIXED LOT — no compounding, no scaling,
the same 0.01 from the first trade to the last. $1,000 deposit, 20 months,
2,453 trades, every tick, 99% history quality.
Net profit $14,758 | Drawdown 17.48% | Profit Factor 1.96 | Recovery 27.72
Why show you the smaller number first?
Because when you see a gold EA advertising 6,000% returns, you should assume
one of two things is happening. Either the lot size is being increased after
losses — martingale wearing a different name — or the deposit was inflated to
make the drawdown percentage look small. Both are common. Both end the same way.
So here is my compounded result, side by side with the fixed-lot one:
Fixed lot — $14,758 | DD 17.48% | PF 1.96
Safe (5x) — $65,139 | DD 21.90% | PF 1.92
Standard (10x) — $104,425 | DD 21.10% | PF 2.10
Aggressive (20x) — $177,192 | DD 21.79% | PF 2.15
Now look at the Profit Factor column. 1.96 → 1.92 → 2.10 → 2.15.
It barely moves.
That is the whole point. If lots were being increased after losses, compounding
would distort that number badly. It does not, because the position size is tied
only to how much the balance has grown — never to whether the last trade won or
lost. The bigger profit comes from 20 months of growth, not from risk stacking.
And look at the drawdown column. All three grades sit in the same 21% range at
their recommended deposits. Same trades, same moments, same direction — only the
position size differs. That is the entire difference between the three grades.
What stays non-negotiable:
✅ No grid
✅ No martingale
✅ No averaging into losses
✅ Fixed stop loss on every position — no trade left unprotected
✅ No deposit tricks, no account resets, no cherry-picked brokers
✅ XAUUSD M5, IC Markets optimized
✅ 20 years of live trading behind every parameter
A Profit Factor of 1.9 is not exciting. A 21% drawdown is not comfortable to
publish. But they are real, and they held across 2,453 trades. I would rather
show you numbers you can survive than numbers that look good in a screenshot.
🔥 GoldDragon Safe is live now.
Launch tester price $297 — first 5 buyers only. Then $397 → $497 → $997.
Standard and Aggressive follow shortly.
👉 https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/196485
Real trader. Real account. Real results. 🐉

