Looking for a specialist programmer - page 7

 
Registr писал (а) >>

Oops, I'm late here... :) I agree with YuraZ... it's no laughing matter if a man appreciates his work, rather the opposite... :) On the other hand, it's not clear what exactly Integer meant, he was too laconic... Maybe he called himself a clown... after hearing about YuraZ's rates... Although, again, everyone has his own specifics ... There are people who specifically collect thematic collections of EAs, and "fulfill" the client order, for them, means just to remake a ready-made EA for a specific order ... understandably, that such "work" will be much cheaper than writing a program from scratch ... There are also people who write for free, so to speak, for self-assertion and in the hope of finding a working trading strategy ... Everyone has his own flies in the head ... Well, the latter, usually, are able to do little ... :)

Now Glid: Your idea of a batrer would have made sense if you could prove the value of your strategy... so it looks like I'm trying to pay you with a drawn note... unlike your idea, the programmer's work is quite substantial... And about finding fools on other forums, firstly, everyone who programs in MQL4 is usually here, and secondly, almost all programmers are able to think logically, what actually separates them from non-programmers... If your idea had worked, it would have been much easier to pay for a programmer's work than to make up silly barter schemes... so I wish you all the best... as they say, flag in your hands, drum on your chest and all the best for the meeting...

 
granit77 >> :

Yesterday a stable advisor, which was evenly raising the balance on a tester forward, valiantly finished off the deposit in three days, without failing, according to all the rules.

Thanks for the demo.

Victor, this is fucked up. Let's just as valiantly consider that the market has changed, the bastard.

 

Comrade Integer explained himself quite clearly. He's outraged by the nerve of the guy: asking to pay so much money for a potentially profitable system! Ridiculous, really.


Otherwise his post reminded me a lot of an old joke:


Как-то раз, выступая на конференции Марк Твен получил из зала записку, в которой было всего лишь одно слово: "Свинья". Прочитав записку, он улыбнулся и сказал: "Мне часто передают анонимные письма без подписи, но первый раз в жизни я получил подпись без письма!".

So the hypothesis voiced by Registr has every right to life.


I can responsibly answer to Comrade Integer: high-level specialists value their time and get a decent pay. Of course, no one will pay you so much (I had the opportunity to assess your abilities earlier in this forum), but don't despair - improve your skills and learn from Yuri and other smart experts, and one day proudly ask for $20 for your work instead of $10. And write Yuri "Father!" instead of "Clown".


Just for the sake of general theory, I would like to remind you that it is usually dumpers who get punched in the face, rather than people who value their skills adequately. Extremes with monopolies are not taken into account, not that case.

 
KimIV писал (а) >>

Moscow is another country.

2002. A business trip to a branch of our enterprise "Kungur People's Crafts". I don't know if I deserve it or not, but Moscow is considered the business centre of Russia and many Russian companies try to open their branches and representative offices there, in Moscow. I call Kungur from Moscow and introduce myself: "Hello, it's Igor from Moscow. The Muscovites almost fell out of their chairs, laughing like seizures. And I think I caught the context of their laughter exactly, as if I wanted to live in Moscow or at least I liked it there, or I wanted to join Moscow's greatness, because the phrase "This is Igor from Moscow" should sound proud and majestic and should open absolutely all the doors. And it didn't occur to them at the time that they were the ones who were lapping up the greatness of our Kungur company, that they were the ones who were feeding off the sales of our products. I've been to other cities in Russia and there was no such reaction anywhere. In Kungur, no one would think of laughing if a non-Kungurian called and said: "This is so-and-so from Kungur!". I like my town. And I'm proud of it. On all the forums where it is possible to specify the city, I always write "Kungur". Kungur ice cave. Kungur folk crafts. Kungur machinery plant. Kungur shoe factory. So what if some names disappeared into history? There will be others...

Igor, I think you have some kind of complex... :) In fact, no one's stopping you from living in Moscow too... except that not everyone needs it... ;) And the fact that in Moscow the specialist's labour is much better appreciated... in the economy... ;)

 
bstone писал (а) >>
And to Yuri then write "Father!" instead of "Clown".
Or like my eldest son, expressing the highest degree of appreciation, "BATYA"!!!
 
bstone писал (а) >>

Comrade Integer explained himself quite clearly. He's just beside himself with such impudence: to ask such money for a potentially profitable system laid out "mountainous"? Ridiculous, really.


Otherwise his post reminded me a lot of an old joke:


So the hypothesis voiced by Registr has every right to life.


I can responsibly answer to Comrade Integer: high-level specialists value their time and get a decent pay. Of course, no one will pay you so much (I had the opportunity to assess your abilities earlier in this forum), but don't despair - improve your skills and learn from Yuri and other smart experts, and one day proudly ask for $20 for your work instead of $10. And write Yuri "Father!" instead of "Clown".


Just for the sake of general theory, I would like to remind you that it is usually dumpers who get punched in the face, rather than people who value their skills adequately. Extremes with monopolies are not taken into account, not that case.

:-) I don't claim to be a father! I don't claim to be Robert Fischer either.

But the point is this!

There was a chess player Robert Fischer (maybe someone doesn't know, but I think there are few people who don't know)

Anyway, he was the one who raised the fees of the chess players.

Chess players played for pennies, in tournaments, at simultaneous games.

They didn't make any money, they just got a handout.

( translating to our equivalents of $10 - $100)

The notorious Robert Fischer simply declared to the organizers!

I won't even go e2-e4 for your paltry $10,000.

The guy was scandalous, but he knew his worth!

The organizers scratched their heads and paid him on request - adequately

After him - the chess world's fees went up...

And in general, everyone knows that any world champion earned at least a million quid!

---

Although the analogy is not quite appropriate, but still

Guys, appreciate your work!

 
granit77 писал(а) >>

Yesterday a stable advisor, which was evenly raising the balance on a tester forward, valiantly finished off the deposit in three days, without failing, according to all the rules.

Thank you for the demo...

Sad... but if I scrolled these three days on the tester, will the balance go up?

 
blend писал (а) >>

sad... and if you run the three days in the tester, will the balance go up?

If the trades in the tester do not repeat - then the technology goes to hell!

Even if you lose!

1-The first thing you need to achieve is the accurate execution of deals - real and tester

all which passed in real time on a demo (well, maybe on a micro-real) should coincide at the time of the same area in the tester!

--

You have to deal with each deal in the Strategy Tester which was not passed or was superfluous!

Otherwise, it's useless.

 
blend >> :

sad... but if you play the three days in the tester, will the balance go up?

Nope! The point of the message was that you blew it, you bastard, by all the rules, without breaking the strategy. I was itching to say: "Where are you going, you fool!"

But the purity of the experiment is paramount.

It's precisely the scary thing that a seemingly correctly tested strategy on new historical data yields an unexpected result.

 
YuraZ >> :

If the trades on the tester do not repeat - then the technology goes down the drain!

Even if it is losing!

1-First thing you need to achieve is the accurate fulfillment of deals - real and tester

all that passed in real time on the demo (well, maybe on a micro-real) should coincide when we run the same spot in the tester!

--

For this, you need to deal with each deal in the Strategy Tester which was not passed or was excessive!

otherwise it's useless.


this is not always the case.... I have a couple of Expert Advisors, which conclude deals as soon as they are put on the chart (almost immediately), while in the Strategy Tester the time can only be set daily. So, in order to carry out this experiment, I need to run them exactly at 00.00 server time.... with my GMT+6, I'm too lazy somehow :)..... or in the code to prescribe the time of the first run....

I use a slightly different option: I change the start time when testing - if the characteristics do not change, then I am somewhere close to the right one

Reason: