|
no
esperienza
|
0
prodotti
|
0
versioni demo
|
|
0
lavori
|
1
segnali
|
0
iscritti
|
I'm Dan, a UK-based trader and the builder behind PrecisionFX.
I'm a disabled veteran, and I came to trading the same way many people do — looking for a way to build an income on my own terms. What I found instead was two years of overpriced courses, $1,500 EAs hiding martingale under the bonnet, and tools built to be sold rather than to work.
So I started building my own.
Everything I run is developed, tested and validated in-house: price-action systems on NAS100 and Gold based on market structure, fair value gaps and confluence zones — with a testing discipline I don't compromise on. Nothing goes live until it survives a proper forward test. Every trade has a defined stop. No grid, no martingale, no recovery tricks.
My goal with PrecisionFX is simple: honest, affordable tools for traders who can't afford to be sold rubbish — because I've been on the wrong end of that myself. What you see on this profile is my real system trading real money, wins and losses alike.
I'm a disabled veteran, and I came to trading the same way many people do — looking for a way to build an income on my own terms. What I found instead was two years of overpriced courses, $1,500 EAs hiding martingale under the bonnet, and tools built to be sold rather than to work.
So I started building my own.
Everything I run is developed, tested and validated in-house: price-action systems on NAS100 and Gold based on market structure, fair value gaps and confluence zones — with a testing discipline I don't compromise on. Nothing goes live until it survives a proper forward test. Every trade has a defined stop. No grid, no martingale, no recovery tricks.
My goal with PrecisionFX is simple: honest, affordable tools for traders who can't afford to be sold rubbish — because I've been on the wrong end of that myself. What you see on this profile is my real system trading real money, wins and losses alike.
Daniel Freeman
I built a couple of tools for my own trading and I'd like to know if they're worth sharing
Bit of background first. I'm a disabled veteran. I started building these partly to make my own
trading a bit easier, and honestly partly just to keep myself busy and give my head something to
work on. It turned into a much bigger project than I expected.
They're now at the point where they do everything I need on my own charts, so before I go any
further I wanted to ask people who actually trade this stuff: is this useful to anyone besides me,
and is there anything obvious I've missed?
There are two pieces, and they share the same detection engine — so what the indicator draws is
exactly what the EA acts on. No second implementation to drift out of sync.
THE INDICATOR
Market structure with fair value gaps, and inverted FVGs when a gap fails
Supply and demand zones - optionally only displacement-backed ones, and broken zones flip to
breakers rather than just vanishing
Liquidity sweeps with a rejection-wick filter and equal-level clustering (SSL x3 and so on)
Entry, stop and three targets drawn on every signal. When the trade resolves the lines clear
and leave one tag behind - "TP2 +1.15R" or "SL -1.00R"
A dashboard with win rate, net R, average R per trade, how often TP1/TP2/TP3 actually got
reached, and a long versus short split
Trade history written to file, so "all time" really is all time and survives reattaching
THE EA
Trades the same setups the indicator draws
Real stop loss and take profit sent to the broker with the order, not managed in the terminal
Three targets, scaling out at TP1 and TP2 with the rest running to TP3
Stop to breakeven after TP1, up to TP1 after TP2, optional ATR trail after that
Risk percent of equity or fixed lots, plus a daily loss limit, spread filter and session window
No martingale, no grid, no averaging down, one position at a time
WHAT I'M ASKING
Would you use either of these? And more importantly - what's missing? I've built this around how I
trade, which means there are almost certainly blind spots I can't see from the inside. If there's a
filter, a stat on the dashboard or a risk control you'd expect and I haven't got, I'd genuinely
like to hear it.
I'm not selling anything today. If there's enough interest I'd be happy to release the pair as a
bundle for a small fee. I'd rather keep developing these two properly than put out twenty different
products - I use them myself every day, so they're going to keep getting worked on either way.
Thanks for reading, and thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to reply.
Bit of background first. I'm a disabled veteran. I started building these partly to make my own
trading a bit easier, and honestly partly just to keep myself busy and give my head something to
work on. It turned into a much bigger project than I expected.
They're now at the point where they do everything I need on my own charts, so before I go any
further I wanted to ask people who actually trade this stuff: is this useful to anyone besides me,
and is there anything obvious I've missed?
There are two pieces, and they share the same detection engine — so what the indicator draws is
exactly what the EA acts on. No second implementation to drift out of sync.
THE INDICATOR
Market structure with fair value gaps, and inverted FVGs when a gap fails
Supply and demand zones - optionally only displacement-backed ones, and broken zones flip to
breakers rather than just vanishing
Liquidity sweeps with a rejection-wick filter and equal-level clustering (SSL x3 and so on)
Entry, stop and three targets drawn on every signal. When the trade resolves the lines clear
and leave one tag behind - "TP2 +1.15R" or "SL -1.00R"
A dashboard with win rate, net R, average R per trade, how often TP1/TP2/TP3 actually got
reached, and a long versus short split
Trade history written to file, so "all time" really is all time and survives reattaching
THE EA
Trades the same setups the indicator draws
Real stop loss and take profit sent to the broker with the order, not managed in the terminal
Three targets, scaling out at TP1 and TP2 with the rest running to TP3
Stop to breakeven after TP1, up to TP1 after TP2, optional ATR trail after that
Risk percent of equity or fixed lots, plus a daily loss limit, spread filter and session window
No martingale, no grid, no averaging down, one position at a time
WHAT I'M ASKING
Would you use either of these? And more importantly - what's missing? I've built this around how I
trade, which means there are almost certainly blind spots I can't see from the inside. If there's a
filter, a stat on the dashboard or a risk control you'd expect and I haven't got, I'd genuinely
like to hear it.
I'm not selling anything today. If there's enough interest I'd be happy to release the pair as a
bundle for a small fee. I'd rather keep developing these two properly than put out twenty different
products - I use them myself every day, so they're going to keep getting worked on either way.
Thanks for reading, and thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to reply.
Daniel Freeman
Segnale MetaTrader 5 pubblicato
PrecisionFX — NAS100 & Gold Price Action (Automated) Fully automated price-action system trading NAS100 and XAUUSD on intraday timeframes. Method: market structure (ChoCH/BOS), fair value gaps, and confluence zones — bands where independent levels stack: volume profile (POC/VAH/VAL), fibonacci golden pocket, daily opens, prior highs/lows, and round numbers. Entries trigger only on graded setups; every trade has its stop and target defined before entry. Risk: structural stops on