I need a profitable EA with high performance - automatic trading robot

Specifiche

Developer Brief — Strategy Philosophy and Risk Approach

When implementing the trading strategy, the choice of method or setup logic is fully up to your technical preference — whether it’s trend-following, mean-reversion, scalping, or SMC-based. What truly matters is maintaining a balance between profit potential and long-term capital safety. The priority should always lean towards safety and consistency over aggressive profit-chasing.

In trading automation, the goal is not to win every trade but to minimize exposure on the losing side. A safe system must focus on capital preservation first, ensuring that no single loss or cluster of losses can significantly damage the account equity. Profitability is only meaningful when it is sustainable. Therefore, the logic and parameters should be designed with the following principles in mind:

  1. Risk Management Above All:
    Every trade must have a predefined stop loss and position sizing based on percentage risk per trade (e.g., 1–5%). The code should ensure this is non-negotiable, regardless of signal strength.

  2. Controlled Trade Frequency:
    Avoid overtrading. Even a highly accurate strategy can fail if it opens excessive positions without considering volatility and margin constraints.

  3. Priority on Drawdown Reduction:
    Optimize for minimal drawdown, not just high win rate. A steady 10% monthly growth with 5% drawdown is far more valuable than 40% growth with 30% drawdown.

  4. Loss Containment and Recovery Logic:
    Include conditions that pause new entries after consecutive losses or adapt lot size dynamically to protect equity.

Ultimately, the developer’s implementation should reflect a "safety-first architecture" — where profits come as a byproduct of disciplined execution, robust stop management, and risk control. The trader can choose any entry strategy, but the underlying engine must ensure minimal damage during losing streaks and maintain long-term capital survival above all else.

Con risposta

1
Sviluppatore 1
Valutazioni
(24)
Progetti
31
19%
Arbitraggio
4
50% / 25%
In ritardo
4
13%
Gratuito
2
Sviluppatore 2
Valutazioni
(4)
Progetti
5
20%
Arbitraggio
1
100% / 0%
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
3
Sviluppatore 3
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
4
Sviluppatore 4
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
5
Sviluppatore 5
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
6
Sviluppatore 6
Valutazioni
(2)
Progetti
1
0%
Arbitraggio
1
0% / 100%
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
7
Sviluppatore 7
Valutazioni
(19)
Progetti
31
32%
Arbitraggio
8
50% / 25%
In ritardo
3
10%
In elaborazione
8
Sviluppatore 8
Valutazioni
(25)
Progetti
29
21%
Arbitraggio
20
10% / 50%
In ritardo
8
28%
In elaborazione
9
Sviluppatore 9
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
10
Sviluppatore 10
Valutazioni
(1)
Progetti
2
50%
Arbitraggio
1
0% / 100%
In ritardo
1
50%
Gratuito
11
Sviluppatore 11
Valutazioni
(16)
Progetti
20
0%
Arbitraggio
10
0% / 80%
In ritardo
6
30%
Gratuito
12
Sviluppatore 12
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
13
Sviluppatore 13
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
14
Sviluppatore 14
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
15
Sviluppatore 15
Valutazioni
(16)
Progetti
35
23%
Arbitraggio
4
0% / 50%
In ritardo
2
6%
In elaborazione
16
Sviluppatore 16
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
17
Sviluppatore 17
Valutazioni
(295)
Progetti
473
40%
Arbitraggio
103
41% / 23%
In ritardo
78
16%
Occupato
Pubblicati: 2 codici
18
Sviluppatore 18
Valutazioni
(24)
Progetti
30
13%
Arbitraggio
12
0% / 67%
In ritardo
8
27%
In elaborazione
19
Sviluppatore 19
Valutazioni
(52)
Progetti
57
60%
Arbitraggio
4
0% / 25%
In ritardo
1
2%
Gratuito
20
Sviluppatore 20
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
21
Sviluppatore 21
Valutazioni
Progetti
1
0%
Arbitraggio
1
100% / 0%
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
22
Sviluppatore 22
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
23
Sviluppatore 23
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
1
0% / 100%
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
24
Sviluppatore 24
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
25
Sviluppatore 25
Valutazioni
(1)
Progetti
1
0%
Arbitraggio
2
0% / 0%
In ritardo
0
In elaborazione
26
Sviluppatore 26
Valutazioni
(7)
Progetti
16
44%
Arbitraggio
2
0% / 100%
In ritardo
3
19%
In elaborazione
27
Sviluppatore 27
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
28
Sviluppatore 28
Valutazioni
(2)
Progetti
3
0%
Arbitraggio
1
100% / 0%
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
29
Sviluppatore 29
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
Ordini simili
Here is an example of Requirements Specification for the development of the MACD Sample Expert Advisor, which is available in the MetaTrader 5 standard package. 1. The idea of the trading system is as follows: market entries are performed when MACD's main and signal lines intersect in the current trend direction. 2. Trend is determined based on the Exponential Moving Average with the specified period
I’m looking for a trading bot where I can use a balance of £1000 to make regular entries making £20-£40 per entry. obviously, I want to have minimum loss with a lot more profit being made
I’m hiring an experienced MQL5 developer to finish and fix an existing project (NOT building from scratch). I have: An existing MT5 EA (.mq5 + .ex5) that is based on my TradingView logic A TradingView indicator version used for signals/alerts The EA works but has logic/consistency issues and needs improvements + cleanup Goal Make the EA reliable and consistent: Ensure entries/exits match the intended logic Fix
Dear Developer, I am looking to develop both a MetaTrader 5 Indicator and a MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisor (EA) based on the swing depth logic shown in the Pine Script code attached below. The indicator and EA must be built as separate files but must follow the exact same signal logic so both display and execute identically. Please carefully review the requirements below and confirm your understanding before starting
I have a High-Frequency Trading EA and I need a full conversion and optimization for MT5. The goal is to ensure stable execution and reliable performance on real accounts (IC Markets Raw and similar ECN brokers). I need an experienced and reputable MQL5 developer to: Convert the existing strategy to MT5 with full fidelity to the original trading logic (entries, SL, breakeven, trailing, pending orders). Optimize the
I need a professional MT5 Expert Advisor (fully automated trading robot) for scalping on M1 timeframe. 1. General Requirements Platform: MetaTrader 5 Type: Fully automated EA (no manual confirmation) Timeframe: M1 only Symbols: XAUUSD, BTCUSD, USDCAD Must support running on multiple charts simultaneously Clean, optimized, and low-latency execution logic 2. Strategy Logic (Scalping Model) The EA should use: Trend +
The indicator a bit inverted. But it doesn’t matter to me as long as the winrate make sense for investment. For brief details regarding the indicator. What should have been a sell, i inverted it into buy with sl and tp swapped(only change the name of sl and tp for visualisation , but the code still on right tp and sl) . And in script ive inverted the signal command code. But the trouble is the tp and sl cant be
All other Necessary filters already coded , Mostly it is referring to another expert copy pasting . Live Chart Optimization . Optimization from Signal Trigger Point . Apply to stay ahead . While applying please explain the correct trailing stop loss for value gap entries
I would like to create a robot with the smart money concepts, that integrates order block,FVG,supply & demand ,read the market structure,liquidity and also trade with the session and also after a liquidity sweep a market structure is needed to verify the reversal and a retracement to the order block and sometimes fair value Gap
I’m looking to acquire an existing, profitable Expert Advisor (EA) with full source code to add to our client investment portfolio. To be clear, this is not a request to develop or design a new strategy. If you already have an EA that is proven, consistent, and production-ready, I’m open to reviewing it immediately. Please apply only if you meet all the requirements below. Submissions without a proper introduction or

Informazioni sul progetto

Budget
100 - 500 USD