MTS = profit FALSE ||TRUE - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
"Can you see me well, you banderolls?" (C) Kaa
I see everyone's enjoying the monkey games. So, championship 2008. Expert attached.
We randomly choose the entry direction, as well as stop and profit sizes. We trade only one lot with a maximum size of 15 - everything is like the Sapiens. We play on EuroUSD.
Lot size is regulated by composter library lot_lib - https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/7749 Method - percentage of deposit, risk 33%. Too risky? What do you expect - a championship!
Dummy variable TotalNumber allows multiple passes, i.e. we set optimization from 1 to 603 on the period of the last championship. Genetic algorithm OFF.
Start of the championship! Tadam!!!
Ten finalists:
Trading completely out of the blue on that period would have netted almost 150K GEL.
I.e. it is quite possible that this cosmic result is just a fluke. Which in no way belittles Batter's work, but puts a big fat cross on any attempts to use the Championship results as an indication that automatic profitable trading is possible.
And my assessment as an expert is 98% ... And it's achievable, believe me... :))
98% of profitable trades is for suckers. Decent programmers do not allow losses at all. That is, a decent EA should have 100% profitable trades. If 98% - then it's a shitty expert...... I once saw an expert who gave 101% of profitable trades...... "And my estimate as an expert is 102%... And it's achievable, believe me... :))"
But maybe who has more? )))))))))))))))))
One day you will realise the pointlessness of fighting windmills. Better to just live... without fighting... just live, that's all... You don't believe that's possible? You'll be rewarded according to your faith.
:) I don't believe... I just solved the "problem" for myself, while you, who believe that it is not possible to solve this problem, avoid it. And you deprive yourself of money. :)) Actually, it's not even like that anymore...
In today's time you don't have to fight with DCs, there are already places where everything suits ..... :)
"Can you see me well, you banderolls?" (C) Kaa
I see everyone's enjoying the monkey games. So, championship 2008. Expert attached.
We randomly choose the entry direction, as well as the size of stop and profit. We trade only one lot with a maximum size of 15 - everything is sapiens-like. We play on EuroUSD.
Lot size is regulated by composter library lot_lib - https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/7749 Method - percentage of deposit, risk 33%. Too risky? What do you expect - a championship!
Dummy variable TotalNumber allows multiple passes, i.e. we set optimization from 1 to 603 on the period of the last championship. Genetic algorithm OFF.
Start of the championship! Tadam!!!
Ten finalists:
Trading completely out of the blue on that period would have netted almost 150K GEL.
I.e. it is quite possible that this cosmic result is just a fluke. Which in no way belittles Batter's work, but puts a big fat cross on any attempts to use the Championship results as an indication that automatic profitable trading is possible.
super! "in 2008 the expert is writing from scratch, based on the script :-)))) "
---
you're right timbo... you could write a random number generator and get a random number one, two, three
---
Question two - there is randomness and there is a static pattern - what about it?
and i'll answer right away - there's no point in talking about it at the moment - there are no such statistics
---
wait a little 25.12.2008 we will know who, hopefully we will see both Vakena and BETTER
by the way Dominani in 2006 took 2nd place, he was doing very well but it was his lack of stops on the martin that killed him
This year I will also use an Expert Advisor of the WINWIN type, which is suitable for competitions
("WINWIN" is a strategy, its type, not a specific EA)
---
I mentioned all this to make it clear what I was talking about - statistics
- I am talking about the fact that if someone has done something, he will probably do it again!
it's better to talk about probability!
---
who has a higher probability of being higher in the table - BETTER or the EA writer who got to the end of the table with the maximum minus ?
:-))) assuming an upward trend
super! "in 2008 the expert is writing from scratch, based on the script :-)))) "
Not really, you need to get yourself 600 monkeys, then there's a chance one of them will be a winner with this solid result. But you have to feed them all. I mean, register them for the championship.
Methinks, tremble! Crowds of monkeys going to war on automated trading.
Metaquotes, tremble! Crowds of monkeys going to war on automated trading.
Into the quotes of the day )))
Not really, you have to get yourself 600 monkeys, then there's a chance that one of them will be the winner with this solid result. But you have to feed them all. I mean, register them for the championship.
Methinks, tremble! Crowds of monkeys go to war on automated trading.
>>) I'll make do with one.
It all depends on the attitude, on the inner conviction. If you are convinced that the whole world is against you, then you will fight everyone and everything. But the world doesn't really care about you or your beliefs. It is reciprocating. You create potential, and the world tries to balance it out.
there's a very instructive film called "the secret" if you can. it really confirms what Kima says.
there is a very instructive film called "the secret" if you can. it clearly confirms Kima's words
>> 100% true.