Risk to reward ratios are a worthless tool if you don’t know the win rate as well.
I deal with people all the time who think that a very good risk to reward ratio is needed on every single trade. Often people think a RRR of 1:3 or more is needed on every single trade.
The problem is that people take risk and reward ratios alone in a vacuum without considering the win rate.
After all, if you win only 5% of the time, then a system with an RRR of 1:3 is a massively losing system.
Meanwhile if you have a system with a 35:1 RRR but a win rate of 97.3% then that’s a winning system. (This is the exact case with roulette. If you think an RRR of 35:1 can’t work, then you’re essentially saying that the billions of dollar casinos have earned off roulette going back 300 years is merely luck and soon the casinos will lose all their money to gamblers. Do you really believe that? If so please say so in the comments!)
Again, it’s just two components.
-1: The risk to reward ratio.
-2: The win rate.
Examples.
-1:
-1:50 RRR.
-0.00000001% win rate.
-System = bad.
-2:
-5:1 RRR.
- 90% win rate.
-System = good.
As you can see, a risk to reward ratio alone tells you nothing. The win rate and the risk to reward ratio always need to be used in conjunction. You really can’t use one to evaluate any trading system without the other.
Thanks for reading!
Have a great day!
Cheers!
:))))))))))))))))))))))
I deal with people all the time who think that a very good risk to reward ratio is needed on every single trade. Often people think a RRR of 1:3 or more is needed on every single trade.
The problem is that people take risk and reward ratios alone in a vacuum without considering the win rate.
After all, if you win only 5% of the time, then a system with an RRR of 1:3 is a massively losing system.
Meanwhile if you have a system with a 35:1 RRR but a win rate of 97.3% then that’s a winning system. (This is the exact case with roulette. If you think an RRR of 35:1 can’t work, then you’re essentially saying that the billions of dollar casinos have earned off roulette going back 300 years is merely luck and soon the casinos will lose all their money to gamblers. Do you really believe that? If so please say so in the comments!)
Again, it’s just two components.
-1: The risk to reward ratio.
-2: The win rate.
Examples.
-1:
-1:50 RRR.
-0.00000001% win rate.
-System = bad.
-2:
-5:1 RRR.
- 90% win rate.
-System = good.
As you can see, a risk to reward ratio alone tells you nothing. The win rate and the risk to reward ratio always need to be used in conjunction. You really can’t use one to evaluate any trading system without the other.
Thanks for reading!
Have a great day!
Cheers!
:))))))))))))))))))))))