Question to the administration of mql5.com - page 2

[Vladislav Andruschenko]

You said it right - trust in the marketplace is the first most important thing.

No one forbids making a separate version with some limitations but with enough authority to check the product before you buy it.

[Stanislav Korotky]

Igor Makanu:

useful information, read the rules and discussions Market, for some reason I did not see such a thing, is this verified information?

SZS: but in my opinion this method will not help.... to attract users will have to give a working TF and symbol, that's what users will pick up such free EA and will cut cabbage for free! ;)

I have been advised so by Market moderators while this channel was open, I have made demos by such a principle. But since then the automatic check that runs on multiple instruments / timeframes (and their set can change, as far as I know), so the way with restriction on the symbol / timeframe has become more problematic.

PS. As a rule of thumb, it's not the product that costs money, it's the support. A worthwhile product will be bought for the sake of support.

[Andrey Kozak]

However, I have also encountered an interesting situation. A customer buys a product, leaves a bad review, then a second customer buys it and an hour later puts in a bad review too. I try to get in touch with them in the Market to help them set it up, but they don't respond. I leave an email, they don't write... It turns out very interesting and strange at the same time. If a person buys a product but fails to configure it, they should be interested in getting help from the developer. It makes sense.

[Igor Makanu]

Stanislav Korotky:

I was advised this way by the marketplace moderators while this channel was still open, I used this principle to make demos. But since then the automatic check is on, which runs on several instruments/timeframes (and their set can change, as far as I know), so the symbol/timeframe restriction method has become more problematic.

PS. As a rule of thumb, it's not the product that costs money, it's the support. A worthwhile product will be bought for the sake of support.

OK, that's good info, thanks!

[Konstantin Yartsev]

I also opened a topic on demo products. I suggested linking them to a computer ID in the Market (so that they would not be downloaded a second time on the same hardware) and limiting the test to a week.

In the same thread, an even better idea was worked out: MKL makes a separate demo server, on which the potential buyer can check the product once a week without the possibility ofcopying transactions, etc. In this case, do not limit some product features (multicurrency, lot, etc.), as it is done in the "free" version - they can be the sultanas. A very workable version of the demo tests.

[Zlaya_budka]

[Zlaya_budka]

[Zlaya_budka]

[Konnell]

Andrey Kozak:

How so? It's going to be time-limited. It will have worked through a test period and then stop. And then you have to buy it anyway.

Maybe we should make the price of the EA lower so that people buy it?

[Ljubisa Vujicic]

Den dobri...how can i withdraw my money from the Mt5 Show.... i did not start trading i just filled a lot and bet 20dollars there and then changed my mind...i do not want to trade...how will i withdraw my money