For those who are convinced that all EAs with a martin are losing out. - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I agree, butwith a martin many people think they always lose 100%.
It's not about the martin per se, it's about what to screw it to. If you add it to a sinker, sooner or later this mix will 100% go to zero, and if you add it to Expert Advisor, which is already working in profit, then martin may help (to decorate the balance curve) and very well may not go to zero, it all depends on the possible series of losses ...
Can we hope that this EA with a Martin will work for several years without losing money? Can I trust this Expert Advisor with a large initial deposit? The tester optimizer has not been used. The critical parameters were selected at random during several tester tests. I agree in advance with possible critics of low profitability of the Expert Advisor. The average annual profit from 2008 is about 63% of the initial deposit, the maximal drawdown being 6712 and relative drawdown being 31.34%.
Bank interest on deposits in local currency in Ukraine ~17%.
It's not about the martin per se, it's about what you screw it to. If it is attached to sinker, sooner or later this mixture will 100% go to zero, and if it is attached to Expert Advisor, which is already working in profit, then martin may well help (to decorate the balance curve) and it may even be that it will not go to zero, it all depends on the possible series of losses ...
Depressing, somehow...
For some reason, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof comes to mind.
It's depressing somehow...
For some reason, "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" comes to mind.
A bit of colouring....
At a 50% drawdown you close all the trades and you're left with half the money! And start all over again.....
Conclusion: martin has nothing to do with it. The problem is in the system!
But if to an EA, which is already working in the plus, then martin may well help (decorate the balance curve) and very possibly not lose, it all depends on the possible series of losses...
The bank interest on deposits in local currency in Ukraine is ~17%.
1. It is no coincidence that I have given profit figures (63%) also from 2008 besides the report. Low volatility in earlier years underestimates the total profit for the whole period.
2. It is incorrect to compare deposit growth with and without reinvestment.
A bit of colouring....
At a 50% drawdown you close all trades and you're left with half the money! And start all over again.....
Conclusion: martin has nothing to do with it. The problem is in the system!
khorosh:
...
2. It is incorrect to compare deposit growth with and without reinvestment.
In this case, it is very correct. For we are comparing two investment options. And both of them are of "maximum settings".
In this case, it is very correct. For the two investment options are being compared. And both of them are with "maximum settings".