Crossover courses: how are they formed? - page 9

 
wise >>:

Хорошо видно, как "арбитражная ситуация" рассосалась за ту секунду, пока мы считали. Просто пришла новая котировка, и все стало на свои места.

There is a thread on the EA with comments, which explains a lot. I won't repeat myself.

 
getch писал(а) >>

There is speculation, as you have, and there are facts - a careful study of the issue, like the EA's statistics.

Before EA, people were also reasoning at the impossible/possible level.

Run EA and see if it is yes or no.

Hey, smart guy ... I bet you $5000 that arbitrage at ECN brokers is impossible.

 
Risk >>:

Ну и зачем Вы этим клоунам что-то объясняете ?

Если Mathemat умножать не умеет, с таким ником ему просто надо удавиться уже от позора, а у getch кто-то 100K сделал на арбитраже, zhuki - что за новая мулька, в таких диоптриях одни глюки только и видит.

Если бы такой бред они писали на форумах по фондовым рынкам, их бы там просто на смех подняли, а в ДЦ вообще наверное народ под столом от этого форума :)

If you are personally acquainted with the chief dealers of the big DCs, ask them about arbitrage. There is, of course, no reason for me to believe them.

 
getch >>:

Есть домыслы, как у вас, и есть факты - тщательное исследование вопроса, как статистические данные советника.

До появления советника народ тоже рассуждал на уровне невозможно/возможно.

Запустите советник и посмотрите, да или нет.

That's how you'll be riding the ears of your long-earned customers, or whatever your interest is in PR for this type of "arbitrage". The topic of synthetics has only been discussed here a few times. If those discussions didn't seem complete enough to anyone, that's their personal problem. People with their heads have drawn conclusions and made their own calculations. There's no need to pass off your boyish expert advice as a breakthrough in "meticulous study" of Forex (read "so well explained, that even Aunt Clava with a failing grade in mathematics can understand it").


Personally, I'm speaking as someone who spent a year doing synthetics with trading in a real account. I don't need to be told what to do. You should just lay out a list of those priligy kitchens where "arbitrage" is possible, it will be the best confirmation of your words.

 
getch >>:

Есть ветка по советнику с комментариями, где очень многое расписано. Повторяться не буду.

Whenever I want to promote my own underachievement, I will repeat myself in all the threads. And when you have to answer for what you're saying, you just flush it out. How predictable.

 
getch писал(а) >>

If you are personally acquainted with the chief dealers of the big DCs, ask them about arbitrage. I, of course, have no reason to believe them.

Can't I talk to the chefs ? ;)

It's only a sucker like you can ask the casino if you can make money in it.

 
Risk >>:

Слышь, умник ... спорим на 5000 $ что арбитраж у ECN брокеров невозможен.

Will I argue that arbitration is possible? Or will you argue that it is not possible?

How have you researched this issue?

Link to topic.

 
Risk >>:

Ну и зачем Вы этим клоунам что-то объясняете ?

At first I thought something interesting had passed me by. I started digging around and it turns out that there are theorists "scrutinizing" forex and spike hunters in shameful kitchens. In principle, this is true. I have again become convinced that if you want to find something that works, you have to do it yourself. On the forum, you may see something useful only as an idea. And if you have a ready-made implementation, it definitely does not work. =)
 
getch писал(а) >>

Will I argue that arbitration is possible? Or will you argue that it is not possible?

How have you researched this issue?

Link to topic.

So you claim it's possible to make money, bring in a stack of arbitrage profits - that would be proof that you've made money from arbitrage. Is a week enough ?

 
getch >>:

Я буду доказывать, что арбитраж возможен? Или же вы будете доказывать, что он невозможен.

Of course. It is impossible to prove impossibility. The fact that you have such a lapse in trivial knowledge speaks volumes. Hint -- "black swans." Requires proof of black swans. You need to prove there are no black swans. Prove it, you hear. Prove it.
Reason: