A trading system without a drain. Needs a programmer.

 
 
Write for-good-letters@yandex.ru
 

I give the text of the author of the topic at his request, as he can not leave messages and even a new topic to report the inability to use the forum, he can not open - constant messages about the possible duplication or 30 seconds since the last message.
TEXT (apologies for the delay of almost 24 hours):

Manually my idea works almost perfectly except for some nuances that need to be clarified. The manual mode has only been tested on one instrument so far, but it brings in about 10% of depo per day. Don't consider me crazy, I'm not new to Forex and I'm well aware of how confusing these figures can be.

The difficulty is that I need to monitor indicators on several TFs at the same time. One of them - Stochastic - can go to the right value for a long time, and may suddenly (in a minute) give the desired value of the opposite one, i.e. entry can be missed if you miss it.

.

At the first stage the task is to automate exactly this most complicated part of the system -
to register simultaneous presence of SEVERAL stochastics at several TFs in proper positions.

I see the solution (if only possible) as follows:
is made from a standard signal stochastic, tracking three (at least two) timeframes. Adjustable parameters are standard, like in conventional stochastics + entry of trigger values for each timeframe. The signal - a sound + window with a message about the alarm - on one TF (warning alarm) or on two (three) - a signal to open an order.

The advantage of this system is that in the simplest variant, the entry points are determined not only accurately, but independently of the trend - at every reversal. Thus, the worst that is guaranteed in any case is a small profit.
If we open only on trend reversals (on reversals), then we get the very 10% (or more) of the deposit. My record is 10% within three hours without violation of MM. Losses are excluded in competent hands.

TP are determined by any method. I.e. the system gives only entry, but gives it error-free.

 





Interesting!

I managed to write an Expert Advisor on stochastics, which made literally 10 entries per year
and they were guaranteed
tested for 3 years, not a single loss
but few entries
but a day to catch 10% of the deposit is cool

can get the values in the indicator - an EA for all TFs at once


initially I have the idea of writing an EA that reads more than one TF

as an additional signal can certainly be used xml-ph-0008@deepl.int

 

Not a beginner.... 10% a day..... sounds cool. But not a beginner should know a successful entry is half the success, and 10% per day is possible only with a transcendent MM, or with luck. Although I've had days with 30% a day, when I was totally green :)

The Indicator is a great help. If the idea is really sensible, I'm ready to quickly and accurately compose an EA, test it on real tick data, bring it to trade on the real account and pay figaro#mail.ru.

Files:
 
EVladMih писал (а):

I give the text of the author of the topic at his request, as he can not leave messages and even a new topic to report the inability to use the forum, he can not open - the constant messages about the possible duplication or 30 seconds since the last message.
TEXT (apologies for the delay of almost 24 hours):

Manually my idea works almost perfectly except for some nuances that need to be clarified. The manual mode has only been tested on one instrument so far, but it brings in about 10% of depo per day. Don't consider me crazy, I'm not a beginner on Forex and I'm well aware of how confusing these figures can be.

The difficulty is that I need to simultaneously monitor indicators on several TFs. One of them - Stochastic - may go to the right value for a very long time, and may quickly (in a minute) give the desired value of the opposite one, i.e. entry is missed if you miss it.

.

At the first stage the task is to automate exactly this most complicated part of the system -
register simultaneous presence of SEVERAL stochastics at several TFs in proper positions.

I see the solution (if only possible) as follows:
is made from a standard stochastic a signal stochastic that tracks three (at least two) timeframes. Adjustable parameters - standard, as in a standard stochastic, + entry of trigger values for each TF. The signal - a sound + window with a message about the alarm - on one TF (warning alarm) or on two (three) - a signal to open an order.

The advantage of this system is that in the simplest variant, the entry points are determined not only accurately, but independently of the trend - at every reversal. Thus, the worst that is guaranteed in any case is a small profit.
If we open only on trend reversals (on reversals), then we get the very 10% (and more) of the deposit. My record is 10% within three hours without violation of MM. Losses are excluded in competent hands.

The TPs are defined in any way. I.e. the system only gives an input, but gives it error-free.

What do you mean by "no breach of MM", what percentage of the depo?
 
Figar0 писал (а):

Not a beginner.... 10% a day..... sounds cool. Except that not a beginner should know a successful entry is half the success, and 10% per day is possible only with an exorbitant MM, or with luck. Although I've had days and 30% a day, when I was completely green :)...

Authorized to write for and on behalf of the author of the topic. :)
He still can't handle this forum himself.
The link to #MTF_Stochastic.mq4 displays "404 PAGE NOTE FUND" with a proud MQL logo.

All reasoning about 10% is expected, predictable, etc. etc. I am familiar with the subject and confirm its viability. As far as it can be automated - life will show, but in VERY TRUE MANUAL MODE everything works OK at 50% - in the sense that there is only the entry, which is the very half of success. The MM is not broken.
Personally, my opinion is that exits can also be done the same way. I.e. with sufficient volatility do flips - then I just don't undertake to predict the outcome.
It's just that without automation this method would take years to test decently!!! So for now only one (very volatile) instrument and only inputs. MM is not violated.

 

As I was posting the previous message, Vault18 gave the go-ahead. Someone at his place has already started working.

Since no one can say what kind of specialist has started to act-villain and what his results will be - it is proposed to continue to offer their services.

Who agrees to work on the topic "optionally" for sporting interest - can inform the author of the idea to e-mail, we can work in parallel. In case of good result Motherland will not forget anyone! ;)
And Vault18 is not a greedy man. His email address is f-x{}fxmail.ru

 
EVladMih писал (а):

As I was posting the previous message, Vault18 gave the go-ahead. Someone at his place has already started working.

Since no one can say what kind of specialist has started to act-villain and what his results will be - it is proposed to continue to offer their services.

Who agrees to work on the topic "optionally" for sporting interest - can inform the author of the idea to e-mail, we can work in parallel. In case of good result Motherland will not forget anyone! ;)
And Vault18 is not a greedy man. His email address is f-x{}fxmail.ru


I`m interested to work on this strategy as an advisor and I`ll give him my version for free, but I need an idea description.
By the way, I don't understand the e-mail address, where it is f-x{}fx AT mail.ru instead of AT?
 
elritmo писал (а):
I am also interested to work on this strategy as an option for myself, if something turns out in the form of an EA and the author of the idea will be interested in other implementations, then I will give him my version for free, but I need a description of the idea.
By the way, I don't understand the e-mail address, where it is f-x{}fx AT mail.ru instead of AT?
Please. Only the answers will not arrive until tonight.
There may even be a discussion in this thread, but for now the description of the idea will not be published.
See above description of the indicator.
By the way, it turned out that in numerical expression the idea is not as simple as in visual and manual. :(

Replacement of the dog - to protect against spammer scanners. There was a time I'd had enough of their charms.
Where did AT come from in your post - I do not understand. The letters to the right address have already arrived...
Just in case I'll give it again (replacing the brackets): f-x{}fxmail.ru
 
2 FION: I don't understand your question about MM... If it's deciphered, it's Money Management, if it's Russian, it's risk limitation.
Well, what else is there to explain, I can't even think about it. :)

The question "what percentage of the deposit?" is probably written in a hysterical state. ;) IMHO, it's all clearly written about the percentage.
And it seems to be clear to the rest of us.... Clarify the questions.
Although there is no point in specifying, especially questions of this kind - we are already talking about an elective.
Reason: