For those who are convinced that all EAs with a martin are losing out. - page 22
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Changed the reinvestment formula. Made it more aggressive. I will stop there for now. Let it rest, maybe some more ideas will come to mind later.
Changed the reinvestment formula. Made it more aggressive. I will stop there for now. I will let it rest, maybe some other ideas will come to mind later.
Changed the reinvestment formula. Made it more aggressive. I will stop there for now. I will let it rest, maybe some other ideas will come to mind later.
It's a strange thing, you convince us that you have a non-drainable pourer, but you put it off in a far corner.
There's something wrong there.
Yuri! Well done, well done!!! Looking forward to PAMM!!!
The strange thing is, you convince us that you have a non-drainable pourer, but you put it off in a far corner.
There's something about that one that's not clear.
Read Roman's answer. Where should I rush to? I have two versions of the real world, I am financially secure, and I do not need anything in particular. That is why I approach each expert carefully and do not rush.
Yuri, would you be so kind as to run an expert on gold?
Very, very interesting.
1. Not yet satisfied with profitability.
2. Long wait for reinvestment to accelerate the initial lot.
3. the only positive thing I have achieved is stability in the test over the entire quote history.
If you have decided to use the method of re-investment, you will have to wait for the reboot of the initial lot. 1.
If you want to raise the profitability of the order, you have to put some money in it. 2) What are you waiting for? At least and cents on the 4th.
3. That's cool! And as for the small TFs, the impact of the spread increases... So go ahead, IMHO! Investors will throw... ...to the account!
Here's the behaviour of one of my combat exposures in the tester:
Parameter optimisation until last September, then cent micro-real.
Translation -- piss. *You can't fool an ass with a picture.)
Why so rude? Yes, I, like most people, don't like taking unnecessary risks and I approach advisor preparation carefully. Is that a flaw of mine as well? Do you remember the story on TV when two young people in love crashed on a bungee jump? Well, I would not jump from a bridge without checking rope and its tightness. Would you?