Rationale for the existence of support lines - page 5

New comment
 
Mischek:

Well, it's obvious that you can't, but you have to prove it if you think you can.

Good proof, nothing to say ))

It's obvious-unbelievable.

 
paukas:

Good proof, nothing to say ))

Straightforward obvious-unbelievable.


))

You can't because it's SB and any channels are also random, unlike CD, where channels if not rule, at least participate as a behavioral pattern, and in SB there can't be behavioral patterns by definition

So why is it possible on SB?

Courage Vladimir, this is a Nobel Prize at least

 
Mischek:


))

You can't because it's SB and any channels are just as random as CD, where channels are at least involved as a behavioural pattern if not ruled, whereas SB can't have behavioural patterns by definition

So why is it possible on SB?

I once showed it to a friend. So he looked and looked and finally said, that I have a bad READ, not really random ))

Do you have a normal one?

 
paukas:

I showed it to a friend once. So he looked and looked and finally said that I have a bad CRT, not really random ))

Do you have a normal one?



I don't have one, everyone uses some popular C, but the MT one will probably do
 
Mischek:

I don't have one, everyone's using some popular C
You do that and you'll get a Nobel Prize. Would you like to try it on a temperature graph? Or is there a "behavioural component" there too?
 
paukas:
You do that and you get a Nobel Prize. Would you like to try it on a temperature graph? Or is there a "behavioural component" there too?


The temperature graph isn't SB.

You dodged the proof.

 
Mischek:


The temperature graph is not SB

You have dodged the proof.

I didn't say anything to prove it.

The temperature graph is not SB? What's SB?

 
The channel is... I can't say it without swearing. Imho - no one really understands why, but they are there. EACH TIME. Same problem with resistance/support levels. The only relatively reasonable explanation I see is that someone made them up some time ago and told everybody. However - there is another explanation as well - it's glitches. :) Here's why: when you don't track the resistance levels - you don't see them, but if you wait for something important to happen at some significant level in the past - you can see a real circus there! And we are not even talking about 1-day extrema, but about the fluctuations of the previous day on M15 - there are such periods in the market when the price goes to one extreme and then to another. As far as I know, Russian trading floors usually attribute it to some otherworldly force in the form of the almighty Puppet. :)
 
paukas:

And I did not assert anything that I have to prove.


Nah, that's not fair, you're winding me up, I'm offended.

I wonder how you can interpret your answer to Alexei differently.

 
Mischek:

Nah, that's not fair, you're winding me up, I'm offended.

I wonder how else to interpret your answer to Alexei

It's a question. There's even a question mark, see?

His assertion requires proof.

Proofs like.

"it can't be because it can never be"

"because it's obvious."

"because it's heavier than air"

are unfortunately not admissible.

123456789101112...19
New comment
Reason: