You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Of course it will.
Therefore, the ratio under the root should not be the ratio of periods, but the numbers of bars in those periods.
So under the root should not be the ratio of periods, but the number of bars in those periods.
Alexander, do you insist, or shall we think about it?
Alexei, the author has withdrawn this thesis
No, I withdrew it by mistake and then was too lazy to write it again.
Try to imagine a day consisting of one hour bar.
There will be no difference between the hourly and daily paths.
relevant for a given value
No vodka for Sharikov
tara: Празднуем 100-летие уравнений Ланчестера?:)
More like Einstein.
No vodka for Sharikov
Are you going to beat him, daddy?
No, I took it off by mistake and then was too lazy to write it again.
Try to imagine a day consisting of a single hour bar.
There will be no difference between the hour bar and the day track.
I did. It won't.
Now you imagine a company consisting of a single fighter. What's that got to do with Lanchester?
I imagined that. It won't.
Now imagine a company made up of one soldier. What's that got to do with Lanchester?
I was only arguing that for other markets (not forex) this formula needs to be adjusted.
Markets that are not traded around the clock are the majority.
Yes and in forex the same effect would occur if you take the charts above the daily charts.