Programmer as a partner - page 6

[[Deleted]]

Fduch писал(а) >>

Yesterday, at 1am this very idea came up and I wrote an EA on it. The only difference: when the stop loss of one order is reached, I open another order in the same direction as the remaining order. After that a TakeProfit is reached (which is at a distance of several points from the stop of the opposite order) and both orders are closed. The result is slightly better -)

Well, your strategy is much more complicated. In the test there are no stops or takeoffs, in the decision-making terms there is not a single parameter, only one order at a time and I wrote it (for the first time) on the second or third day of my acquaintance with MQL, I didn't know any more complicated. But it's not about specific ideas and their implementation, but the fact that they do exist, in spite of the pessimists.

[[Deleted]]

Fduch писал(а) >>

Figar0 wrote >>.

Yesterday, at 1am this very idea came up, wrote an expert on it. The only difference: at .

I don't think Figar0 described his system, or did I miss something?

[[Deleted]]

mamma писал(а) >>

I don't think Figar0 described his system, or did I miss something?

It's so primitive that you can just pick it up by looking at the balance curve and the TF). I don't want to voice it, not by virtue of being "stiff", but it's just more useful to get to these things yourself.

[Oleksandr]

mamma >> :

I don't think Figar0 described his system, or did I miss something?

"It's just a bare, totally symmetrical input-output without a single parameter" (c) Figar0

[[Deleted]]

Fduch >> :

"It's just a bare, totally symmetrical input-output without a single parameter" (c) Figar0

Got it, I guess.

Toys from Vinin

[[Deleted]]

Figar0 >> :
It's so primitive that you can just pick it up by looking at the balance curve and TF). I don't want to sound it out, not by virtue of "stiffing", but it's just more useful to get to such things yourself.

;)

Strategy Tester Report

Game

AlpariUK-Demo (Build 218)

Symbol		EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period		Daily (D1) 1999.05.24 00:00 - 2008.10.31 00:00 (1999.01.01 - 2008.11.01)
Model		Every tick (the most precise method based on all available minimum timeframes)
Parameters		Lots=0.1; MAGIC=0;
Bars in test	2562	Ticks modelled	21122856	Modelling quality	86.44%
Mismatched charts errors	29
Initial deposit	1000.00
Total net profit	4704.91	Gross profit	69065.30	Gross loss	-64360.39
Profit factor	1.07	Expected payoff	1.91
Absolute drawdown	16.00	Maximal drawdown	2985.34 (45.50%)	Relative drawdown	48.14% (1210.06)
Total trades	2463	Short positions (won %)	1256 (51.27%)	Long positions (won %)	1207 (53.60%)
		Profit trades (% of total)	1291 (52.42%)	Loss trades (% of total)	1172 (47.58%)
Largest		profit trade	387.90	loss trade	-381.92
Average		profit trade	53.50	loss trade	-54.92
Maximum		consecutive wins (profit in money)	12 (601.90)	consecutive losses (loss in money)	13 (-528.85)
Maximal		consecutive profit (count of wins)	709.67 (7)	consecutive loss (count of losses)	-1043.32 (6)
Average		consecutive wins	2	consecutive losses	2

[[Deleted]]

polished it up:

[[Deleted]]

I told you it couldn't get any easier)

[[Deleted]]

Figar0 >> :

>> I told you it couldn't get any easier.)

That's the hard truth. How am I supposed to live with that now? :)

Yes, here's the last option (everything stays symmetrical and without sl and tp):

[[Deleted]]

mamma >> :

That's the hard truth... How are we supposed to live with that now?! :)

Yeah, here's the last option (everything stays symmetrical and without sl and tp):

How are the trades closed without ss and so on?