Hedging Martingale.

[[Deleted]]

The idea came from watching a fixed lot martingale trade. The price did not correct for a long time, I had to manually open orders in the opposite direction, put S/L to B/S and wait for the price to turn around.

Who has any ideas for such a robot (fully automatic)

[transcendreamer]

edutak:

The idea came from watching a fixed lot martingale trade. The price did not correct for a long time, I had to manually open orders in the opposite direction, put S/L to B/S and wait for the price to turn around.

Who has any ideas for such a robot (fully automatic)

Martingale

which trades with a fixed lot.

[Mykola Demko]

transcendreamer:

martingale

trading a fixed lot.

There must be no reinvestment involved.

What was the base lot at the beginning is what is traded.

[Roman Myravyev]

Urain:

There must be no reinvestment involved.

What was the base lot at the beginning is what is traded.

The point of martingale is to increase the stake, which is why respectedtranscendreamer highlighted the quote. And Mr.edutak may have been referring to a regular grid.

or rather a grid with locks.

and maybe not even a grid, just a lock.

[[Deleted]]

deskipper:

The point of martingale is to increase the stakes, which is why the respectedtranscendreamer highlighted the quote. And Mr.edutak may have been referring to a regular grid.

or rather a grid with lots.

and maybe not even a grid, just a lock.

If you do not have a fixed lot, it means that all orders have the same volume, for example 0.1.

What are your ideas, make a martingale that does not lose.

[Roman Shiredchenko]

edutak:

By fixed lot, we mean that all orders are of the same volume, e.g. 0.1

Any ideas, make a martingale that doesn't drain.

Just wrote a post here about it... :-)

That the averaging volumes are the same

If the volumes are the same, then either by averaging or by reversing a position, you have to wait a very long time for them to come to profit, so, IMHO - this is much less effective than using one or the other option to increase the volume of the next or averaging or reversing a position.

[Mykola Demko]

deskipper:

The point of martingale is to increase the stakes, which is why the respectedtranscendreamer highlighted the quote. And Mr.edutak may have been referring to a regular grid.

or rather a grid with lots.

and maybe not even a grid but just a lock.

Separate the concepts of base rate and increasing it when there is a loss,

and reinvestment, where as the balance grows, the base rate increases,

and you'll understand my point.

[Roman Shiredchenko]

edutak:

By fixed lot, we mean that all orders are of the same volume, e.g. 0.1

What are some ideas, to make a martingale that does not drain.

Google it - there is a lot of information on the subject.

Including setting a lock and then breaking it.

[Roman Shiredchenko]

Here's a warm-up - you can look at the shuffle - just read all the comments on it after the description.

To the question of "hedging" - perhaps you should change it to locking... :-)

Try to formalise the conditions of a hedge-lock here intelligently...

[[Deleted]]

R0MAN:

Google it - there is a lot of information on the subject.

Including the staging of a loca followed by its resolution.

There's no need to destroy the lock. S/L will be in B/S - it will close on its own.

[Roman Shiredchenko]

edutak:
There is no need to destroy the lock. S/L will be in B/S - it will close on its own.

I see. Try to formalise the hedge-lock conditions here ...