Does anyone have a decent advisor for sale? - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Everything should be on a market basis. We should announce an auction. Scandinavian :)
And the seller gets less, but now if it suits him.
It makes sense, you're buying fruit in winter, not waiting for the fall when the trend is down
And what happens if he does not meet expectations and sells out? Does consumer protection work in this case? ....))))
What happens if he doesn't meet expectations and leaks? Does consumer protection work in this case? ....))))
And just like with trust management, it doesn't.
The buyer assumes the risks and is aware that cats do not dry in the microwave
A transaction will only take place if and when there is a difference in the buyer's and seller's valuation of the goods.
The seller believes that the goods are worth less than the terms of the transaction and the buyer believes that the goods are worth more than the terms of the transaction.
This is not a negotiable condition,
Everyone tries to make a profit on the transaction, if the seller believes that the product is worth as much as written in the transaction,
or the buyer will assume that the goods are worth as recorded in the transaction, the transaction will not take place because there is no profit.
A transaction will only take place if and when there is a difference in the valuation of the goods between buyer and seller.
The seller believes that the goods are worth less than the transaction value and the buyer believes that the goods are worth more than the transaction value.
This is not a condition that applies,
because everyone will try to profit from the transaction if the seller believes that the goods are worth as much as is stated in the transaction,
or the buyer thinks the product is worth as much as written in the transaction, then the transaction will fail because there is no profit.
In other words, if car dealers display cars for $XXXX and buyers buy them, buyers believe that the value of the cars displayed is $YYYYY and $XXXXX < $YYYYY?
Where did you get the weed?
;)
The seller believes that the goods are worth less than the transaction value, and the buyer believes that the goods are worth more than the transaction value.
There is a concept called "use value"; it has nothing to do with the price of the goods, but it does shape demand.
A transaction will only take place if and when there is a difference in the valuation of the goods between buyer and seller.
The seller believes that the goods are worth less than the transaction value and the buyer believes that the goods are worth more than the transaction value.
This is not a condition that applies,
because everyone is trying to make a profit in the transaction, if the seller believes that the product is worth as much as is stated in the transaction,
or the buyer thinks it's worth as much as it's written in the deal, the deal doesn't work because there's no profit.
I'm out of the woods.
That is, if car dealerships put up cars for $XXXX and buyers buy them, then the buyers are sure that the value of the cars on display is $YYYYY, with $XXXXX < $YYYYY ?
Where did you get the weed?
;)
You're a computer trader, for instance, you would buy a computer for $300 if you know you'll never sell it for more than that,
and now at the same price, you're a buyer and you're happy to pay $300 for it.
All that's changed is what you need the computer for.
It's a revolution in logic. :)
It's a revolution in logic. :)
No not a revolution it was described long ago by D. Nevidimov in The Religion of Money or the Cure for the Market Economy.
You're a computer trader, for example, you would buy a computer for $300 if you know you'll never sell it for more,
and now for the same price, get in a buyer's position.
This is an example of customer value for a retailer.
If a product is purchased for resale, its price + costs should be less than the estimated selling price, it's natural.
But here is another example: You go to the grocery shop to buy butter and know that it costs 38 rubles per pack. There is butter on the counter and the price tag is 38 roubles. Are you going to turn round and go home without the butter? ;)