Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2909

 
elibrarius #:
The question is probably not for me, as I don't see any problems with replenishment.
I am interested in the future.
It is reckless to plan something on Forex. We all know here that we work with about 50/50 probability.

I was thinking of helping with mytarmailS access on my account. The probability of a drain is high, so it's almost a sure way to make money.

That's reality - no offence intended.

 
Aleksey Vyazmikin #:

I was thinking of helping with mytarmailS access on my account. The likelihood of a drain is high, so it's almost a sure way to make money.

That's reality - no offence.

Alexei, I need forex, not forts
 
Aleksey Vyazmikin #:

I was thinking of helping with mytarmailS access on my account. The likelihood of a drain is high, so it's almost a sure way to make money.

This is reality - no offence taken.

That's very strange logic

 
mytarmailS #:
Alexey, I need forex, not forts.

Yes there is Forex - the signal in the profile is tormented :)

 
Renat Akhtyamov #:

very strange logic

If a person is going to lose anyway, maybe a cent account is enough for him? :) That's why I was asking about trading plans.....

 
Aleksey Vyazmikin #:

Yes there is Forex - the signal in the profile is tormented :)

Well then we can communicate, write

 
mytarmailS #:

Well, then we can chat, write

So I'm asking - do you want to experiment or have you decided that it's time to become a millionaire?

 
mytarmailS #:
Second of course
But I think it's time to go to a PM.

It's a private message.

 
Reading about the renaissance and Simons who has learnt the market. Quote
In the late 1960s, several years into the summer, Baum and the mathematician Lloyd Welch, a specialist in information theory who worked in the office next door, developed an algorithm for analysing Markov chains - a sequence of random events in which the probability of a subsequent event depends solely on the current state and is independent of the past.
Markov chains imply that it is impossible to predict future actions with absolute accuracy, but it is possible to follow the chain of events and make reasonable assumptions about possible outcomes based on them.
An example of a Markov game is baseball. If a batter misses three balls and scores two strikes, the number and order in which strikes were thrown during that time is irrelevant. If the batter scores one more strikeout, he is out of the game.

There's something to that. It would be nice to find his articles from 1967 about market conditions and the following. The man is a giant, of course))))
 
Valeriy Yastremskiy #:
Reading about the renaissance and Simons who has learnt the market. Quote
In the late 1960s, several years into the summer, Baum and the mathematician Lloyd Welch, a specialist in information theory who worked in the office next door, developed an algorithm for analysing Markov chains - a sequence of random events in which the probability of a subsequent event depends solely on the current state and is independent of the past.
Markov chains imply that it is impossible to predict future actions with absolute accuracy, but it is possible to follow the chain of events and make reasonable assumptions about possible outcomes based on them.
An example of a Markov game is baseball. If a batter misses three balls and scores two strikes, the number and order in which strikes were thrown during that time is irrelevant. If the batter scores one more strike, he is out of the game.

There's something to that. It would be nice to find his articles from 1967 about market conditions and the following. The man is a giant, of course ))))

It's not hard to see that in real trading.

for example, right now you piss on the whole cutlet and the price instantly turns against the open order and continues until you settle down.

You settle down, what's left is what's left.

If you don't settle down, you lose everything.

There's no need to think and invent anything else, it's as simple as an egg.

So you can't identify a regularity on the basis of history, it's a dabble and attempts to summarise, leading to absolutely no result.
Reason: