hello ask about my test is this good or bad test reuslt
also this work with low spread
Q8See R #:
also this work with low spread
also this work with low spread
You are obviously using an SL that is (much) greater than your TP.
It seems a little fitted, but can't tell from the report posted, only assume. Because the results are very different on GBP vs EUR.
Overall, I would say your average profit loss ratio is unhealthy.
If market moves outside your expectations, the EA might destroy your account. - BTW, where is the Z-Score?
EDIT:
I just saw your modelling quality is below 99%
The test results can be and should be considered invalid.
Edit:
Just saw, it's MT4. MT4 has no Z Score.
Consider following concerning modelling quality:
Let's assume you have 100 Ticks per minute on average. You have 1440 minutes per day. Let's assume you run your algorithm only 1000 minutes a day.
Let's assume your modelling quality is 99%
That would calculate to 10 minutes of garbage data a day.
Your testing time is 1 year. Let's say you add up all days to around 250 days for one year. That would mean you have 2500 minutes of garbage data...
2500 minutes are already little more than 40 hours of trading. A week in the forex market has 5 days. You trade 1000 minutes a day, that is equal to around 16.6 hours a day. So you would have accumulated around 2.5 days of trading activity with complete nonsense.
Question. Would you let your EA run 2.5 days on garbage data in real life? And what would be the result?
Admitted, the garbage data is in fact synthetic ticks, filled by the tester, but it has nothing to do with the real data.
I would guess, the missing pieces of data mostly are allocated around news events.
Probably that's why your drawdown is not as high as I would expect for a RR below 1.0
... But these are all speculations... Please keep this in mind.
Edit:
Why I assume 100 ticks per minute. Because this would mean, 2500 Minutes * 100 Ticks = 250.000 calls to your OnTick() function with unreliable data.
Edit:
I corrected the trading days per year from 300 to 250, which is more accurate approximation.
You set your spread to 2 (0.2 PIPs); totally unrealistic. See what your broker's average spread is and use that value.
Most brokers with variable spreads widen considerably at end of day (5 PM ET) ± 30 minutes.
My GBPJPY shows average spread = 26 points, average maximum spread = 134.
My EURCHF shows average spread = 18 points, average maximum spread = 106.
Q8See R #:
my spread its start from 0.00 to 0.05 in normal not more high then that i trade on iorbex broker
my spread its start from 0.00 to 0.05 in normal not more high then that i trade on iorbex broker
and no commission??
No broker will last very long with such a business model.
I know brokers with zero spread, but they charge commission on their trades. How else would they make money then? Maybe B-Books... But at that point I am already denying that brokers services anyways. I want them to make profits, else my money isn't safe with them.
Dominik Christian Egert #:
commission
commission
all the trade test with commission from the lot size 0.05 also 0.10 commission
this test i try it with live account and test account last week its get profit but the reuslt asking for years from small account its hedge strategys
| Symbol | GBPUSD (British Pound vs US Dollar) | ||||
| Period | 1 Hour (H1) 2022.07.01 00:00 - 2023.07.13 23:00 (2022.07.01 - 2023.07.14) | ||||
| Model | Every tick (the most precise method based on all available least timeframes) | ||||
| Parameters | EA_MADE_BY=1; EA_Made_For=1; EA_Requirements=1; o0=0; st__=2; o1=0; stll_=0.1; dvd=0; mnl=0.03; mxl=0.1; o2=0; PipStep=20; mxo_=30; o3=0; fp__=1; prs_=80; o4=0; hcb=false; hcs=10; o4a=0; ddtb=true; ddt=1000; ddob=false; ddo=100; o5=0; ddf=2; ddl=0; o6=0; nft=30; rp_=30; spf_=5; | ||||
| Bars in test | 7461 | Ticks modelled | 29443782 | Modelling quality | 90.00% |
| Mismatched charts errors | 1 | ||||
| Initial deposit | 1500.00 | Spread | 2 | ||
| Total net profit | 6756.14 | Gross profit | 8539.18 | Gross loss | -1783.04 |
| Profit factor | 4.79 | Expected payoff | 4.38 | ||
| Absolute drawdown | 23.04 | Maximal drawdown | 658.88 (15.59%) | Relative drawdown | 17.59% (639.60) |
| Total trades | 1544 | Short positions (won %) | 588 (92.18%) | Long positions (won %) | 956 (90.38%) |
| Profit trades (% of total) | 1406 (91.06%) | Loss trades (% of total) | 138 (8.94%) | ||
| Largest | profit trade | 25.02 | loss trade | -87.98 | |
| Average | profit trade | 6.07 | loss trade | -12.92 | |
| Maximum | consecutive wins (profit in money) | 54 (325.06) | consecutive losses (loss in money) | 5 (-85.47) | |
| Maximal | consecutive profit (count of wins) | 325.06 (54) | consecutive loss (count of losses) | -87.98 (1) | |
| Average | consecutive wins | 12 | consecutive losses | 1 | |
this last test and live account with good profit last week but i can trust the strategys and keep it and low size lot or try more
Files:
pic.png
19 kb
William Roeder #:
You set your spread to 2 (0.2 PIPs); totally unrealistic. See what your broker's average spread is and use that value.
You set your spread to 2 (0.2 PIPs); totally unrealistic. See what your broker's average spread is and use that value.
my broker on all usd currency 0.09 the high spread only it night will be high for 1 hr then back to 0.0 to 0.10 commission for the lot size is start by the lot size
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
eurusd test
the error what its means
the trade lot is 0.03
Is this enough and the strategy is successful or unclear or needs to be checked