Casting a net of pending orders and catching fish called profit

 

A well-known strategy. A certain number of pending orders placed at equal distances from each other are set. Working with Take Profit, but without Stop Loss.

The drawdowns are large, but the main goal of the profit is achieved. Is it possible to take such a risk?

Files:
testergraph.zip  19 kb
 
Well, if the strategy is well known but the multibillionaires aren't adding up, then you probably can't =]
 
The graph is obtained by testing the interval from 01.04.08 to 09.07.08.
 
barada писал (а) >>
Well if the strategy is known but there are no multibillionaires, then you probably can't =]

If you don't read Forbes magazine, there are more of them :-)

 

The fish are good, but the moose usually can't handle such a net. It's good if first the fish, then the end of fishing, and then the moose. How about the other way around, - elk, end of fishing...?

A 3-month test for such a system is self-defeating,

 
Figar0 писал (а) >>

The fish are good, but the moose usually can't handle such a net. It's good if first the fish, then the end of fishing, and then the moose. How about the other way around, - elk, end of fishing...?

A 3 month test for such a system is self-defeating,

Moose won't catch a moose. Can only catch a stopout. The test is from 01.01.08. If you periodically withdraw profit. then with such profit it is not a shame to sometimes drain the initial deposit.

Files:
 
khorosh писал (а) >>

Moose will not catch. Can only catch a stopout. The test is from 01.01.08. If you periodically withdraw profit, then with such a profit it is not too shameful to sometimes drain the initial deposit.

what is the criterion for withdrawal of profits ?

----

the most important criterion here is to cast in the direction of the trend and not against it

then what is the difference between: 1) just go in and stand 2) mulling with pauses

?

 
YuraZ писал (а) >>

what is the criterion for withdrawal of profits ?

----

the most important criterion here is to cast in the direction of the trend and not against it

then what is the difference between: 1) just go in and stand 2) mulling with pauses

?




When doubling the depot, you can withdraw half of it. The Expert Advisor is not trending, but flat. When entering, we look at the prehistory. if there is a sideways trend, we run the advisor.

 
khorosh писал (а) >>

When doubling the deposit you can withdraw half of it. The Expert Advisor is not trending, it is flat. When entering it looks at the prehistory, if there is a sideways trend, then we start the expert.

i.e. a network of orders is thrown in both directions

got it

---

I wrote a grabber like this on GBPJPY - in 2007 it was on the market from February till end of summer

Standing real, but only on the buy side

the orders were set in 2007 at 40p from the price and only the buy limit many without takeovers

about 10 or so limiters followed the price from below

THAT'S A BEAUTY!

 
So what's the matter, do you want to be collectively discouraged? You already have an advisor, load up the depot and take a profit.
 
Roger писал (а) >>
So what's the matter, do you want to be collectively discouraged? You already have an Expert Advisor, load the deposit and take a profit.

I think the author is looking for confirmation ...

his thought

---

>> though I gave the example that his system can collapse if you go against the grain.

Reason: