|交易品种||毛利, USD||损失, USD||利润, USD|
|交易品种||毛利, pips||损失, pips||利润, pips|
基于有关不同交易商真实账户的执行统计的平均滑移点按点数指定。它取决于 SquaredDirect-Live2 提供商以及订阅者之间不同的报价，以及订单执行的延迟。值越低意味着复制的质量越高。
This signal is running on about 25% maximum drawdown risk judging from portfolio backtest.
Copying the signal might cause high slippage because of different spreads during swap time, so I don't recommend to copy it.
It would be better to buy or rent the EA yourself: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/40941
The signal also uses the Breaking News Filter.
The portfolio backtests I show are usually done with a fixed lot size of 0.1. This means that you have to look at the fixed drawdown, not the percentage one. For Density Scalper with all pairs, the drawdown was about $600 for 0.1 lots, which you can use to scale to the desired risk level. For example, using 0.3 lots on all pairs would have had about $1800 maximum drawdown together in the backtest.
Things to consider:
The maximum backtest drawdown happened in 2008 and never occurred again in later years. In 2008 the spreads were much larger than they are now and the tick data quality is also much worse for early years. So some developers argue against even using data before 2010/2011. However, since optimization usually leads to underestimation of the expected drawdown, I still prefer to use the 2008 drawdown as the best estimate. 2008 was also the year of a global financial crisis, which might be a risk factor to consider for the future.
Please also keep in mind that there is never any guarantee that the future drawdown will be less than the historical one.