下载MetaTrader 5
查看详细统计,请 登录 或者 注册

成长

1月
2月
3月
4月
5月
6月
7月
8月
9月
10月
11月
12月
YTD
共计:

结余

净值

提取

  • 净值
  • 提取
交易:
3829
盈利交易:
2566 (67.01%)
亏损交易:
1263 (32.99%)
最好交易:
4883.00 JPY
最差交易:
-5151.00 JPY
毛利:
422020.00 JPY (308857 pips)
毛利亏损:
-414192.00 JPY (269534 pips)
最大连续赢利:
18 (3908.00 JPY)
最大连续盈利:
8778.00 JPY (13)
夏普比率:
0.02
交易活动:
94.32%
最大入金加载:
73.55%
采收率:
0.14
长期交易:
2059 (53.77%)
短期交易:
1770 (46.23%)
利润因子:
1.02
预期回报:
2.04 JPY
平均利润:
164.47 JPY
平均损失:
-327.94 JPY
最大连续失误:
8 (-6758.00 JPY)
最大连续亏损:
-10608.00 JPY (4)
每月增长:
112.23%
年度预测:
1361.77%
算法交易:
99%

分配

交易品种 交易 Sell Buy
GBPUSD 1125
EURUSD 868
USDJPY 581
USDCHF 565
EURCHF 71
CHFJPY 70
AUDNZD 63
EURNZD 60
AUDCAD 57
EURGBP 55
USDCAD 53
GBPCHF 50
EURCAD 43
EURJPY 37
GBPJPY 35
XAUUSD 28
GBPCAD 20
NZDUSD 19
AUDUSD 13
EURAUD 12
AUDCHF 3
AUDJPY 1
2505007501K1.3K1.5K1.8K2K
2505007501K1.3K1.5K1.8K2K
2505007501K1.3K1.5K1.8K2K
最好交易:
4883.00 JPY
最大连续赢利:
18 (3908.00 JPY)
最大连续盈利:
8778.00 JPY (13)
最差交易:
-5151.00 JPY
最大连续失误:
8 (-6758.00 JPY)
最大连续亏损:
-10608.00 JPY (4)
结余跌幅:
绝对:
659.00 JPY
最大值:
57933.00 JPY (90.69%)
相对跌幅:
结余:
90.69% (57933.00 JPY)
净值:
39.38% (4687.00 JPY)

MFE和 MAE分布点图

在使用期内为每个持仓订单记录最大利润(MFE)值和最大亏损(MAE)值。这些参数使用最大未实现的潜在值和最大容许风险额外表现每个平仓订单。MFE/利润和MAE/利润分布图显示每个订单为沿X轴绘制的收到利润/亏损值的一个点,而潜在利润(MFE)和潜在亏损(MAE)的最大显示值则是沿Y轴绘制。

无数据
无数据

将光标放在参数/图说明上可以看到最佳和最糟的交易系列。在文章交易中的数学:如何评估交易结果中了解更多有关MAE和MFE分布的信息。

基于有关不同交易商真实账户的执行统计的平均滑移点按点数指定。它取决于 TitanFX-01 提供商以及订阅者之间不同的报价,以及订单执行的延迟。值越低意味着复制的质量越高。

InstaForex-Europe.com
0.00 × 1
AFXCapital-Real
0.00 × 1
LoyalBank-Real5
0.00 × 1
GAINSY-Real
0.00 × 6
FXGlobe-Real
0.00 × 1
ICMarkets-Live01
0.27 × 172
ICMarkets-Live10
0.33 × 2475
ICMarkets-Live11
0.33 × 118
ICMarkets-Live02
0.35 × 1973
ICMarkets-Live03
0.36 × 1330
ICMarkets-Live04
0.42 × 285
ICMarkets-Live08
0.43 × 949
USGFX-Live2
0.43 × 369
Pepperstone-Edge02
0.46 × 322
ICMarkets-Live07
0.54 × 651
Pepperstone-Edge03
0.55 × 711
ICMarkets-Live09
0.59 × 784
Pepperstone-Edge05
0.59 × 243
AxioryAsia-02Live
0.64 × 1235
TOPFX-Live Server
0.64 × 204
XMUK-Real 15
0.66 × 82
Darwinex-Live
0.74 × 172
Pepperstone-01
0.75 × 166
SGTMarkets-Live
0.76 × 215
FXDD-MT4 Live Server
0.86 × 222
145 更多...
查看详细统计,请 登录 或者 注册

有关正确的信息,请参阅日语或英语页面。 谢谢。

https://www.mql5.com/en/users/takaho

平均等级:
Asaj Jack
195
2017.10.11 05:35 
 

用户没有留下任何评级信息

yukinko29
212
2017.09.11 05:20 
 

I was so stupid enough to believe in this EA...

bigneil
333
2017.08.18 21:42   

There would appear to be completely different data shown on the webpage here compared to what my MT4 sees. As of now, the webpage shows 5 open positions (4 GBP sells and 1 AUD sell), whereas my MT4 shows 4 trades (1 GBP sell and 3 USD buys). Trading histories are completely different also. A different signal's data on the webpage?

Andrei Tolokonnikov
1904
2017.08.15 21:07 
 

用户没有留下任何评级信息

gogopuja
300
2017.08.15 20:40  (已更改2017.08.15 20:47)   

8 issues for Opus08 to ponder on...

Please consider this as constructive criticism. Don't try to fight it, understand it and improve your craft.

1. The signal Author probably has a very good intention but

If you look at his MFE/MAE (Maximum profit/Maximum loss) you will notice a lot of wasted profits(MFE position going to loss).

Troubling still is this .. You will also notice MAE that went really low and could be avoided if the Stop Loss had been appropriately set.

Example: This signal has at least 9 of the largest losing trades that should have been completely avoided.

Please if you are a statistics major or have any meaningful education in it you can see in plain sight that there are zero profitable trades, when a position went below -2000JPY. So why are there losing trades that are below -2000JPY. Stop loss should have been firmly set at -2000JPY.

This SL setting would have kept nearly 12000JPY still in Author's balance. Thereby reducing the losses by half. i.e your current drawdown would have been 20% instead of 40% and growing.

2. The Author promised that DD will never again go to 38% as that was due to low balance in the beginning.

Hard to believe that broken promise or any other promise from this author. Why was this DD mark of 38% exceeded and is now at 46%?

3. It may be OK to get the worlds best EAs and try to win by letting them loose on the market. But market will always teach you that something new is to be learned everyday.

If the author cannot adapt to the situation that the market generates, it is difficult for the subscriber to believe in his ability to trade. Can Author Adapt?

4. The Author does not have a trading background and does not understand market conditions as per his own admission. He believes that backtesting of EAs is enough to foresee future wins and profits.

No matter how good an EA is, you have to understand what market condition it works in and when it may fail you. Hence prudently pause the EA in such market conditions.

Otherwise you may trade yourself to death in a crazy market. Remember ... "The Market Can Remain Irrational Longer Than You Can Remain Solvent"

He keeps insisting that the EAs have not failed for the last 20 years of backtesting.

But has he researched which are the historical times that the EAs had the most DD and what were those market conditions/news at that time? Probably didn't bother to do that.

Now may be agood time to start. It's never too late.

5. The Author is not allowing direct feedback/messages to him by way of communication directly so we can discuss in a fair manner and give suggestions or remedies.

You have to keep your communication open, even to people who criticize you and even if you think that it is mostly hogwash. Hidden in every criticism is a potential for growth.

6. Author is using 4 different types of EAs. This should provide diversity in trading and hence better risk management.

Why are all these EAs failing at the same time with such large DD? Perhaps the risk settings are not correct. Perhaps they are not so diverse or uncorrelated for all market conditions?

I wish he can answer this question?

7. All signal providers on mql5 are providing a much higher risk to cater to the greediness of the subscribers.

The subscribers are to blame for the popularity of signals that promise great reward using very high risk.

If the reward is not at least 20% a month we subscribers(most not all) don't want to even look at the signal.

Subscribers will get what they ask for. This is a message to subscribers to be more prudent in your outlook and search for signal.

(i) If it looks too good to be true, it most likely is.

(ii)Please do your homework before you look to subscribe a signal.

(iii)Don't be afraid to stop the signal if your balance falls below your comfort level. Capital saved today can be used again tomorrow.

8. Signal provider (Author) is ignoring the basics of risk management. Namely Risk/Reward ratio.

Risk is on average double that of Reward for this signal. This is not a purely scalping signal hence such risk/reward ratio is high.

From Statistics page

Average Profit: 217.01 JPY

Average Loss: -439.04 JPY

Now we have a rapidly dwindling numbers

profit factor = 1.15

Recovery factor = 1.00

Sharpe Ratio = 0.08 (very close to zero == randomness in trading and no variation from any average/poor investment)

Annual forecast = -100% (Basically a high probability of losing all your money)

Profit Trades: 1048 (70.00%) (this % is going down every day)

Loss Trades: 449 (29.99%) (this % is going up every day)

Opus08 please try to be a better signal provider by looking at how you can avoid such market conditions, DD and reduce your MAE positions by using better Stop losses.

Your signal could have been so much better instead of the extreme fear that it is bringing to the subscribers.

Mark De Groot
481
2017.08.15 18:14  (已更改2017.08.15 18:15) 
 

what a waste of money

total unlogical positions are opened, especially chf trades are a drama.

Adrian Ferreyra
321
2017.08.15 16:45 
 

Tuve que retirarme.

Anton Evtimov
138
2017.08.15 16:32 
 

用户没有留下任何评级信息

Tony Gwynne
493
2017.08.15 00:22   

Well, after 2months of subscribing, I have been in profit above ZERO for TWO days, the current expectancy of this EA is -$2.64, that means everytime a new trade is put on, expect to lose that amount on average. Now down THIRTY THREE PERCENT. I don't call that a strategy to give it time over 6months. In six months, there'll be no money left to make any profit. I had a stop on my account at this level, so has shut this signal down. I'm up for renewal in 3 days, and this is another that will go down the toilet. Hadoka, I think I gave it a fair chance and it failed, not because I didn't give it enough time, but everytime it tried to recover, it would fail again and drop back even further. This is not the way an EA should operate. Basically, for all your pomp and bluster about "we don't know what we're talking about", look at the figures, why should anyone trust what your saying when all this EA has done is lose for the last two months? Don't expect people to just stand by and watch as their cash is eaten alive. I'm out.

Fabio Takeo Emori
544
2017.08.14 23:57 
 

Hodaka is always is losting in CHF, but is continnuing trade. This EA is not good !!!!! Wake up HOdaka!!!

Qin Zhao
800
2017.08.14 12:56 
 

用户没有留下任何评级信息

aci-crosser89
111
2017.08.11 15:59 
 

At the Moment it is a little Frustrating. Some Days of good Profit and very good Trading and than Drawdown again because of bad position opening and to big Stop Lose positioning. At the Moment i have like -15% in 8 Weeks.

But i belief this Strategies has much potential and i will stay at this Signal for some more Months.

Nicholas Kaulbach
1061
2017.08.10 14:41 
 

I'm rapidly running out of patience on this signal. There are some fundamental problems with the underlying EA's which are clearly not being addressed. Poor entry points, bad exits. Profit not being claimed and losses not being limited or minimised. This is not a managed signal. Im out.

AndreyFill
200
2017.08.09 08:09 
 

идиотская торговля -17%

Roman Gribov
453
2017.08.08 19:09  (已更改2017.08.08 19:10) 
 

Плюс за то, что не сидит в просадках. Лоси отстреливаюся в молодости. Цел депозит- будет и прибыль.

vijayp4you
71
2017.08.08 12:25 
 

not satisified

frexadv
641
2017.08.03 23:34 
 

only loss, bye bye Opus

Hamed Hashemi Abar
322
2017.07.29 10:08 
 

用户没有留下任何评级信息

ptkost
309
2017.07.28 15:36 
 

July 28th

After about 6 weeks and 394 closed trades I'm 20% in red. No real change in trend. I'm out. I do not recommend.

July 4th

Hodaka owns the signal etc. However, there is a lot of justified criticism in the reviews. I haven't studied in details, but at least now it looks like the algos do not work well when there are significant trends. Maybe the success is better when the market is moving sideways.

What bothers me is fact that he has increased the lot size after loosing many trades. As if he wanted to recover quickly and we know that wont work.

I don't suffer from slippage etc. but I'm 23% red after June 19th. I didn't start with large balance but it still hurts.

Hope to see change in the profit/loss trend in few days...

Silvia Sekeresova
359
2017.07.28 07:16   

Only stupid robot without any positive result.

2018.01.19 22:44
Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2018.01.19 20:42
Removed warning: Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2018.01.18 12:11
Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2018.01.18 07:01
Removed warning: Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2018.01.17 23:36
Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2018.01.17 09:58
Removed warning: High current drawdown indicates the absence of risk limitation
2018.01.17 08:57
High current drawdown in 33% indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.11.17 04:30
Removed warning: High current drawdown indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.11.17 03:29
High current drawdown in 35% indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.11.13 03:09
Removed warning: High current drawdown indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.11.13 01:06
High current drawdown in 31% indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.09.12 00:02
Removed warning: High current drawdown indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.09.11 22:01
High current drawdown in 32% indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.08.23 10:39
A large drawdown may occur on the account again
2017.07.03 18:02
Removed warning: High current drawdown indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.07.03 17:01
High current drawdown in 31% indicates the absence of risk limitation
2017.06.28 03:36
Removed warning: Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2017.06.28 01:35
Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2017.06.23 13:08
Removed warning: Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
2017.06.22 16:26
Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk
查看详细统计,请 登录 或者 注册
观看YouTube上的有关交易信号的视频教程
名称
价格
成长
订阅者
净值
交易
赢%
PF
提取
20.00
USD
132%
2
815
USD
14K
JPY
49
99%
3 829
67%
94%
1.01
2.04
JPY
91%
1:500
复制