The Most Wanted EA

After 2 month using the Ea in diferent risk type. The close positions due the stop loss take the account to a very large negative income. In compare to anothers Ea, its to expensive for the results that it have. Not recommend.

I don’t recommend this EA. He only opened positions 3 times a week, and sometimes he didn’t open positions for two weeks. Even if the Trading Type is adjusted to SuperIntense, the risk is still the same. Whether it is adjusted to high risk or low risk, most of his positions are still Will touch the stop loss and his profit-loss ratio is too low The stop loss needs 2600 points and the stop profit is only 400 points WTF? I don’t even understand what his opening logic is. Every time the opening position is very strange, almost every time The position is hard to hold until the backtest before taking profit, so why not reverse the initial position so that the winning rate will not be higher? This EA is only good-looking in the test chart, and the actual use will only make you lose all your balance...

backtest looks great with only 2 - 5 loss a year, however, this monthly have 3 loss. even with calm or moderate mode. will eventually sl. this product not work 2k. In my opinion, Gold is not fit for this product. Author should reconsider currency such as USDJPY or GBPUSD. EURUSD is doing well so far

Let it run of different settings on different accounts, bot made a huge loss on gold. more than 5 % equity drawndown on FTMO setting (so it does not work), and 1/3 of the account without the setting (30K loss). Just glad it were demo accounts. FTMO setting was on "moderate", the other was was on "Calm". If it does get fixed, I will change this review.

Wasted money. So many SL in real accounts, I don't use the EA anymore. Don't thrust the Backtest, it's fake.

Very bad EA. Huge SL gets hit on a daily basis. Don’t even think spending your money on this crap. This EA is not capable to follow the trend either. Very very very bad !!!

×

Even 1 star is a too much for that scam.

Sorry but it doesn't live up to my expectations. I bought this and I regret it, the backtest was overfitting I think and I see several red flags that aren't explainable by the author. 1. In the backtest view live view (where we can see the entry and exits) it doesn't show the same pattern in this month of live testing. All positions in the backtest were able to take positions in the best level, thus even setting the SL into 60 pips is a very good RR. But when on the live test, all entry level were so bad, and it always opened on the opposite trend, not that it's wrong to trade the opposite, but all the trades were very obvious bullish trend, even you can spot it with simple indicators. I've tested several type: Default (High Intense), Moderate in 2 brokers. 2. Trades opened in different broker different result. And the trades are completely different. I use ICM as author recommends and my other broker HotForex which I've used very long time. In HF broker, the trades were opened more active than the ICM even with the same setting and even sometimes can open position as many as we allowed in the setting but it kinda average its level, which eventually loss all of those trades. Now in ICM, it's not as active in HF but as those who have tested, this month it already lost 2 times with default setting 300 pips. The pattern was: 1 Win 1 Loss 1 Win 1 Loss. Thus it wipes most of the money in the account because the RR was 400:3000. IF this EA really lives up as the backtest says (which author really insisted and believed) it should not do like that. Because in the backtest with default setting we can see maximum consecutive loss is 1 time, while the consecutive wins can reach >100 wins. In summary, everything is lost due to following the default setting Author really insisted. The account would be okay even with High Risk setting, if the SL was adjusted to 1:1.

hello, First 2 SL, the same day, Friday March 10, then a 3rd today, for a total of 6 trades in 6 days. It is very far from the backtest which is presented in the description. Not worth the asking price To review seriously !!!

This EA is so great that I am willing to sell my License for USD 250

After a month 1 star for this EA. Will revise again after 2nd month.

The eur usd operation takes many days to close and a high drawdown, gold works well, but it seems quite risky.

Hello everybody ! that is my first review on MQL5, thought I bought several EA in MQL5 (with value of more than 1000 USD), but I felt I had to say something for that one. I had a lot of doubt about the "neuronnal strategy", as everyone is now using the words "quantum" or "neuronnal" for anything, even for health -:). It seems to be fashion, and in fact no one knows what it is really, me included. At the beginning it was weird as the EA did not move at all for 4 or 5 days, so I contacted the developper. Vitalii, took time to make detailled answers about teh way its EA was working, and I had to be patient. At that time I was wondering, if did not lose my money, one more time.. The parameters where "calm" and risk "moderate". then it started.. and it never stopped to make me earn money every week. I lost only one trade on Gold, because of the high volatily last week, and for the first time my SL was hit! But no big deal !! I lost only one trade in 2 month, can you believe that ? Appart from my main live account, I set the EA on a demo account testing the other parameters : "Super Intensive" and risk "high". With those parameters, I lost 3 trades. Not much but more risky, and for me not so interesting. The power of that EA is that it can pick up 98- 100 % of winning trade if you choose the "calm" parameter (it make 150-300 USD a week on Gold with a 3000 USD account). I will keep that (safety first). Vitalii added two other pairs such as EURUSD and EURGBP. Those pairs are not as good as the GOLD (now I have Gold on high Risk), but if you keep it trading style : "calm" and Risk "moderate" or "Low", it is just extra (and safe) money that come on your account.. Apart from that the developper is a nice person willing to help everytime he can. Thanks again Vitalli, keep updating us ! and Greetings from Andorra, Romain

The EA is Very Bad the Backtest is perfect that should gave it up its overfit on past data, the EA is based on RNN and I think its decaying now giving less and less trades even on super intense mode the Risk/Reward ratio is so skewed up so its insane but one you loose one trade that's its it wipes out many winners and the EA was marketed as is can pass FTMO don't even try its wast of time this conclude my time with MQL5 won't buy any EA again

- replying on the author review: the RR is 7.5 and if you look at the backtest there is a lot of trades but as you reach the data where the algo was released the number of trades dropped drastically even at super intense the algo is not trading at all maybe 2 trades per week , and I did trade with algo with real money also with ftmo because you said its can pass ftmo challenge , but as far as i know its not passing ftmo and the number of trades is dropping to the points where its no worth is to trade this EA, its decaying so fast the backtest results can not be replicated which leads me to think that there is no edge here just random change poorly trained RNN plut 7.5 RR so trades over fit to show good historical test so you can sell it for the poor ppl I'm mql who don't know any better, this is why there is this push to increase the price very fast because you know ppl will eventually notice the reality of this product and stop buying , so make money before ppl wake up .

The opinions that they are throwing about the EA are not fair, because they have had some losses it does not mean that the EA is bad, I continue to trust 100% and in its creator Vitalii that he answers any question and does not hide before a loss , what they have to do is adjust their own risk and know what they can afford to lose, I was in aggressive mode and yes, I have lost some capital, but what happened was a black swan, not even the best traders or analysts can predict it, imagine an EA, adjust your risk and let it work, before this loss I had 20 positive operations in a row, the problem is that when you are winning nobody says anything but at the moment of a loss everyone comes out to bite CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR WORK VITALII AND GREETINGS FROM SPAIN

Trading 101: I think it's necessary that I leave a comment on this. Yes last week did have a loss trade. I have a High Risk with a Calm trading setting, It did close 1 trade in a loss but that was less than 20% of the profits it made in the last two weeks. so trading 101, manage risk and don't trade with more than 1% of your capital. This remains an awesome EA. on a separate note, yes we need to learn from mistakes, so I would ask the developer... as this is a self learning EA, can let us know what is the learning it has incorporated technically to avoid this trade in future?

missleading with fake backtest

Пока что большие потери. Наблюдаю дальше. Установлен на разных реальных счетах разных брокеров с разными настройками, очень хаотично и по разному торгует. Если советник "исправится", изменю оценку.

17.03.2023 опять огромные потери, сделка против тренда по золоту. Советник открыл sell против очевидного тренда. Помойка, а не советник. Выброшенные деньги.

A few profitable trades but all the profits and much more lost with one single trade. The ratio risk/reward is very bad on this EA. It would be ok as far the SL is not hit or hit after a few hundreds of trades but when it is hitted after just a few trades, it is hard to trust the reliability of this EA. And also I notice it is quite standard to have between 60 to 100 pips of drawdown to win just 30 pips. It is not worthy.

With one loss on a single pair in calm mode risk high, it occurs to lose 30% of your capital, on the Eurusd a big drawdown is arriving, better to accept the loss and stop trusting this EA because it is burning until now half of my account. And with the EURGPB it has the potential to burn almost all my account in calm mode risk high