Henrique Vilela / Profile

The 2170 build brings this new optimization chart. Look's like there's no way to disable it (attach it back to the strategy tester window) Also looks like that it's not a chart per se, because a code like the one bellow do not list it long chart_id=

#resource "\\Libraries\\Example.ex5" // unknown resource type #import "::Libraries\\Example.ex5" void Example(); #import Any other way to embed a library ex5 into an EA ex5? (I know I should include the library mq5 insted, but I don't have it)

FrameAdd is not working for genetic optimizations in the last build (2085). To reproduce you can optimize the unique variable available here: //+------------------------------------------------------------------+ #property tester_no_cache input

string A= "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" ; // The string above has 200

Hi, I strongly believe that's not possible, but let me ask it anyway: There's any way to make an asynchronous WebRequest with no DLLs use at all? I need to grab some large data from a website but can't afford losing ticks in the

What kind of code could cause this? (backtest) I tried to run it in the debug mode (ctrl+F5) to nail down the exactly line that generates this, but when it happens the debbuger also stops

I'm trying to select a symbol and get its last price string symbol= "ANY_SYMBOL_HERE" ; double last; bool ok= SymbolSelect (symbol, true ); // OK is True bool ok= SymbolInfoDouble (symbol, SYMBOL_ASK ,last); //  // OK is True // last is

In the Tool Box History we have four options to how to present it: Orders, deals, Ordens + deals and positions. We have HistoryOrdersTotal + HistoryOrderGetTicket to iterate over the orders. We have HistoryDealsTotal + HistoryDealGetTicket

To get all deals from an order we can go though the whole History selecting the ones that has an  DEAL_ORDER equals to our order ID. Any more efficient way to do that? We have a HistorySelectByPosition , but I miss a HistorySelectByOrder or

Hi, If you place a DRAW_FILLING indicator over a backgorund bitmap the colors get messed. Change the backgorund color to get it screwed in a different fashion. Anyone knows any kind of workarround? PS: I should open a ticket? Of course. It would

I can receive an array as reference, but can I store it? double *a[]; // '*' - pointer cannot be used double &b[]; // '&' - reference cannot used double c[]; void X( double &d[])   {    a=d;    b=d;

I'm returning INIT_FAILED in a indicator OnInit function , but it's created anyway. If a EA tries to load it it get a valid handle and can't identify that's not working properly. I also tried to force an error, but it get loaded anyway. // Option 1

   // I would like to access that chart that opens AFTER the backtest is complete.    // Not the one created for the visual mode, this one: https://youtu.be/VqyxCRXdCls    // That one that shows all the orders / deals

After the backtest one chart is open with the arrows and lines representing the orders / deals. Is it possible to access / manipulate it? I would like to present some custom statistics there

There's any way (workarounds and crazy ideas are wellcome) to get the strategy tester end date in the optimization start method (OnInitStart)

Metatrader documentation list this file as Modifiable . But I modify it and generate a html report, looks the same. Also, every time the platform opens those files are rewritten. So, is it modifiable or not? How to create better looking reports

Is it somehow disable the auto update or at least disable for beta versions? I guess that my broker's Metatrader (XPMT5-PROD) is misconfigured and it forces me to download beta versions of the Metatrader. Actually I'm using the 1583 (very bugged)

Can't pass an array of scturcts as reference. This bug was introduced in the build 1583: int OnInit ()   {    MqlParam params[ 4 ];    Print ( "A " , ArraySize (params));    Test(params);    return (

Just a suggestion (I'm not sure if the forum is the best place for this). When a signal is created to ask for a (optional) magic number. Only the orders with that magic number would be used by this signal. T‌his way it would be possible to create